Impact of Pre-Extraction Methods on Apple Blossom Microbiome Analysis

This study examines the effect of pre-extraction methods, namely, sonication, grinding, and lyophilization, and the use of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) blockers on the DNA recovery, diversity, and taxonomic resolution of bacterial and fungal communities in apple blossoms. Sonication was the most successful in recovering bacterial 16S and fungal ITS reads across all the collection points and plots. Lyophilization and grinding led to a significant reduction in fungal read counts, while PNA enhanced the recovery of bacterial 16S reads. Sonication improved the efficiency of DNA extraction and yielded greater diversity in the recovered microbial community. Sonicated samples showed greater sensitivity to temporal shifts in microbial community composition. Communities in sonicated samples contained a larger number of bacterial genera, such as <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Staphylococcus</i>, and <i>Erwinia</i>, and fungal genera, including <i>Didymellaceae</i> and <i>Cladosporium.</i> In contrast, lyophilization and grinding led to a reduction in detected taxa. The indicator species analysis determined that 35 bacterial and 21 fungal genera were closely related to sonication, whereas no other pre-extraction method had any associated genera. Our findings suggest that sonication is the most appropriate pre-extraction method for analyzing blossom-associated microbiomes, and that the use of PNA blockers can improve the recovery of bacteria and minimize contamination by host DNA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040923
Primary Topic
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Pre-Extraction Methods on Apple Blossom Microbiome Analysis

Paul E. Moote, Mikhail G. Sulman, Nikhil Patel, Walid Ellouze et al.
Microorganisms
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
article

Impact of Pre-Extraction Methods on Apple Blossom Microbiome Analysis

Paul E. Moote, Mikhail G. Sulman, Nikhil Patel, Walid Ellouze, Jonathan R. Gaiero, Antonet M. Svircev, Darlene Nesbitt
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effect of pre-extraction methods, namely, sonication, grinding, and lyophilization, and the use of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) blockers on the DNA recovery, diversity, and taxonomic resolution of bacterial and fungal communities in apple blossoms. Sonication was the most successful in recovering bacterial 16S and fungal ITS reads across all the collection points and plots. Lyophilization and grinding led to a significant reduction in fungal read counts, while PNA enhanced the recovery of bacterial 16S reads. Sonication improved the efficiency of DNA extraction and yielded greater diversity in the recovered microbial community. Sonicated samples showed greater sensitivity to temporal shifts in microbial community composition. Communities in sonicated samples contained a larger number of bacterial genera, such as <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Staphylococcus</i>, and <i>Erwinia</i>, and fungal genera, including <i>Didymellaceae</i> and <i>Cladosporium.</i> In contrast, lyophilization and grinding led to a reduction in detected taxa. The indicator species analysis determined that 35 bacterial and 21 fungal genera were closely related to sonication, whereas no other pre-extraction method had any associated genera. Our findings suggest that sonication is the most appropriate pre-extraction method for analyzing blossom-associated microbiomes, and that the use of PNA blockers can improve the recovery of bacteria and minimize contamination by host DNA.

MicroorganismsVol. 13(4)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Brock University (CA), London Research and Development Centre
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.