INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL TESTS IN MATHEMATICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

This study investigated the effectiveness of oral tests as an assessment method in undergraduate mathematics courses in university. It aimed at comparing oral tests and traditional written tests in terms of students’ perceptions and actual learning outcomes in various dimensions, such as conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. The study consisted of a quasi-experimental design which was employed to compare the scores of students in the same mathematics courses taught by the same instructor but which differ in the assessment mode, i.e. with and without oral test. In addition questionnaire surveys and focus group interviews were conducted to find out students’ perceptions of oral tests as a means of assessment. The comparative study showed that oral assessments were effective in enhancing students’ conceptual understanding, and this was very much echoed by the results of the questionnaire surveys and focus group interviews. The findings support that educators can consider introducing such assessments in courses where the understanding of concepts is an important learning outcome, which typically is the case for theoretical

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PUPIL International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.8384
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL TESTS IN MATHEMATICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Levin Ho, Chiang Shun Ling
PUPIL International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL TESTS IN MATHEMATICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Levin Ho, Chiang Shun Ling
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of oral tests as an assessment method in undergraduate mathematics courses in university. It aimed at comparing oral tests and traditional written tests in terms of students’ perceptions and actual learning outcomes in various dimensions, such as conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. The study consisted of a quasi-experimental design which was employed to compare the scores of students in the same mathematics courses taught by the same instructor but which differ in the assessment mode, i.e. with and without oral test. In addition questionnaire surveys and focus group interviews were conducted to find out students’ perceptions of oral tests as a means of assessment. The comparative study showed that oral assessments were effective in enhancing students’ conceptual understanding, and this was very much echoed by the results of the questionnaire surveys and focus group interviews. The findings support that educators can consider introducing such assessments in courses where the understanding of concepts is an important learning outcome, which typically is the case for theoretical

PUPIL International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.