Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
The testimonies around HB346 expose deeply polarized discourse that reflects moral, religious, and ethical conflicts, as well as mismatched conversations that are unlikely to persuade opposing sides. Addressing these dissonant narratives requires nuanced advocacy strategies and resources to support effective testimony.
Authors
- Micki Burdick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7315-3767)
- Jeni Stolow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-1861)
- Martha Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0820-7172)
- Amy Mercieca
Institutions
- Tulane University (US)
- Gender Studies (CZ)
- University of Delaware (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Global Women s Health
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1533813
- Primary Topic
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Tulane University