Rethinking historiographical disparities and pathways to reconciliation in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict
This paper critically examines the historiographical disparities that have shaped Georgian and Abkhazian perspectives on their shared and often contested past, a division further exacerbated by Soviet-era influences and modern nationalist narratives. The primary aim is to illuminate how these divergent interpretations of history contribute to enduring misunderstandings and conflict, highlighting the need for a historiographical re-evaluation as a step toward reconciliation. Additionally, this study explores the tension between militaristic and peace-oriented approaches to conflict resolution, with a firm advocacy for peace-building measures. By presenting a comprehensive analysis of historical narratives and projecting a vision for a shared future, this discourse aims to foster a constructive dialogue that transcends historical grievances and promotes cooperative action. Ultimately, the paper aspires to contribute to a holistic understanding of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict and to outline pathways toward a sustainable and mutually beneficial coexistence.
Authors
- Shalva Kikalishvili (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-4735)
- David Bragvadze
Institutions
- American University of the Middle East (KW)
- International Black Sea University (GE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Political Science
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1523526
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 17.04