Rethinking historiographical disparities and pathways to reconciliation in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict

This paper critically examines the historiographical disparities that have shaped Georgian and Abkhazian perspectives on their shared and often contested past, a division further exacerbated by Soviet-era influences and modern nationalist narratives. The primary aim is to illuminate how these divergent interpretations of history contribute to enduring misunderstandings and conflict, highlighting the need for a historiographical re-evaluation as a step toward reconciliation. Additionally, this study explores the tension between militaristic and peace-oriented approaches to conflict resolution, with a firm advocacy for peace-building measures. By presenting a comprehensive analysis of historical narratives and projecting a vision for a shared future, this discourse aims to foster a constructive dialogue that transcends historical grievances and promotes cooperative action. Ultimately, the paper aspires to contribute to a holistic understanding of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict and to outline pathways toward a sustainable and mutually beneficial coexistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1523526
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking historiographical disparities and pathways to reconciliation in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict

Shalva Kikalishvili, David Bragvadze
2 citations
Frontiers in Political Science
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
17.04
article

Rethinking historiographical disparities and pathways to reconciliation in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict

Shalva Kikalishvili, David Bragvadze
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper critically examines the historiographical disparities that have shaped Georgian and Abkhazian perspectives on their shared and often contested past, a division further exacerbated by Soviet-era influences and modern nationalist narratives. The primary aim is to illuminate how these divergent interpretations of history contribute to enduring misunderstandings and conflict, highlighting the need for a historiographical re-evaluation as a step toward reconciliation. Additionally, this study explores the tension between militaristic and peace-oriented approaches to conflict resolution, with a firm advocacy for peace-building measures. By presenting a comprehensive analysis of historical narratives and projecting a vision for a shared future, this discourse aims to foster a constructive dialogue that transcends historical grievances and promotes cooperative action. Ultimately, the paper aspires to contribute to a holistic understanding of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict and to outline pathways toward a sustainable and mutually beneficial coexistence.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
American University of the Middle East (KW), International Black Sea University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.