Evaluating water-induced wellbore instability in shale formations: a comparative analysis of transversely isotropic strength criteria

This study addresses wellbore instability in shale formations by conducting mechanical experiments on bedded shale samples with varying hydration times. We fitted experimental data using two anisotropic strength criteria to determine the shale’s strength parameters. A transverse isotropic stress model was developed to predict the lower limit of the safe drilling fluid density window, examining the effects of hydration time and anisotropy on wellbore stability. Results indicate that rock strength initially increases and then decreases with bedding angle. Within the β 1 to β 2 range, both the Jaeger’s Plane of Weakness model (JPW) and Plane of Patchy Weakness Model (PPW) accurately predicted shale strength; however, below β 1 , the JPW criterion overestimated strength, while the PPW criterion better reflected strength variations. Anisotropy due to bedding significantly increased wellbore collapse pressure, shifting the optimal well trajectory from the direction of minimum horizontal stress to maximum horizontal stress, altering collapse pressure contour distributions. The choice of strength criteria had minimal impact on the trend of collapse pressure with well trajectory. While shale hydration can significantly affect wellbore stability and the lower safe drilling mud window with well trajectory, prolonged contact between drilling fluid and rock gradually increased lower safe drilling mud window. Collapse pressure in vertical or horizontal wellbores was minimally affected by soaking time, whereas inclined wellbores showed greater sensitivity. Notably, horizontal wells drilled in the direction of minimum horizontal stress were more responsive to contact time with drilling fluid, leading to a faster increase in collapse pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1550266
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating water-induced wellbore instability in shale formations: a comparative analysis of transversely isotropic strength criteria

Dong Jiang, Xuejia Du, Yuqi Zhang
4 citations
Frontiers in Earth Science
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
3.45
article

Evaluating water-induced wellbore instability in shale formations: a comparative analysis of transversely isotropic strength criteria

Dong Jiang, Xuejia Du, Yuqi Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study addresses wellbore instability in shale formations by conducting mechanical experiments on bedded shale samples with varying hydration times. We fitted experimental data using two anisotropic strength criteria to determine the shale’s strength parameters. A transverse isotropic stress model was developed to predict the lower limit of the safe drilling fluid density window, examining the effects of hydration time and anisotropy on wellbore stability. Results indicate that rock strength initially increases and then decreases with bedding angle. Within the β 1 to β 2 range, both the Jaeger’s Plane of Weakness model (JPW) and Plane of Patchy Weakness Model (PPW) accurately predicted shale strength; however, below β 1 , the JPW criterion overestimated strength, while the PPW criterion better reflected strength variations. Anisotropy due to bedding significantly increased wellbore collapse pressure, shifting the optimal well trajectory from the direction of minimum horizontal stress to maximum horizontal stress, altering collapse pressure contour distributions. The choice of strength criteria had minimal impact on the trend of collapse pressure with well trajectory. While shale hydration can significantly affect wellbore stability and the lower safe drilling mud window with well trajectory, prolonged contact between drilling fluid and rock gradually increased lower safe drilling mud window. Collapse pressure in vertical or horizontal wellbores was minimally affected by soaking time, whereas inclined wellbores showed greater sensitivity. Notably, horizontal wells drilled in the direction of minimum horizontal stress were more responsive to contact time with drilling fluid, leading to a faster increase in collapse pressure.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 13
Chicago Department of Public Health (US), University of Chicago (US), Daqing Oilfield General Hospital (CN), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.