A Contrastive Morphological Analysis of the Tombulu Dialect of the Minahasa Language and Indonesian in the Context of Local Language Instruction

This research investigates the morphological differences between the Tombulu dialect of Minahasa and Indonesian, focusing on their implications for local language teaching. The study aims to identify those differences and develop pedagogical strategies to address them. Using a qualitative descriptive methodology with a comparative approach, the study adopted the PRISMA framework for systematic literature review, VOSviewer for linguistic cluster analysis, and Voyant Tools for qualitative data analysis. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews with native speakers, direct observation, and document analysis. This study applied the linguistic cluster algorithm to identify key thematic patterns in the morphological structure of the two languages. The results show that there are significant morphological differences, especially in affixation, reduplication, and word formation. Tombulu dialect has a more complicated affix system, which is absent in Indonesian, while Indonesian morphology follows a more standardized and systematic pattern. These differences pose challenges in local language acquisition, especially in understanding word structure and meaning formation. This research recommends that local language teaching, especially for the Tombulu dialect, integrate pedagogical approaches that systematically consider morphological variation. It is suggested that curriculum design and teaching strategies be adjusted to address these linguistic differences to improve students' comprehension and proficiency. However, limitations of this study include a focus on one Minahasa dialect, which limits generalizability. In addition, this study relied on a small sample of native speakers, which may not be fully representative of the wider language community. Future research should consider a wider sample and explore the impact of these morphological differences in a multilingual context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.946
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Contrastive Morphological Analysis of the Tombulu Dialect of the Minahasa Language and Indonesian in the Context of Local Language Instruction

Johan Reineer Tumiwa, Djeinnie Imbang, Fitty Valdi Arie, Gábor Biczó et al.
Journal of Posthumanism
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

A Contrastive Morphological Analysis of the Tombulu Dialect of the Minahasa Language and Indonesian in the Context of Local Language Instruction

Johan Reineer Tumiwa, Djeinnie Imbang, Fitty Valdi Arie, Gábor Biczó, Golda Juliet Tulung, Efilina Kissiya, Sumenge Tangkawarouw Godion Kaunang
article en

Abstract

This research investigates the morphological differences between the Tombulu dialect of Minahasa and Indonesian, focusing on their implications for local language teaching. The study aims to identify those differences and develop pedagogical strategies to address them. Using a qualitative descriptive methodology with a comparative approach, the study adopted the PRISMA framework for systematic literature review, VOSviewer for linguistic cluster analysis, and Voyant Tools for qualitative data analysis. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews with native speakers, direct observation, and document analysis. This study applied the linguistic cluster algorithm to identify key thematic patterns in the morphological structure of the two languages. The results show that there are significant morphological differences, especially in affixation, reduplication, and word formation. Tombulu dialect has a more complicated affix system, which is absent in Indonesian, while Indonesian morphology follows a more standardized and systematic pattern. These differences pose challenges in local language acquisition, especially in understanding word structure and meaning formation. This research recommends that local language teaching, especially for the Tombulu dialect, integrate pedagogical approaches that systematically consider morphological variation. It is suggested that curriculum design and teaching strategies be adjusted to address these linguistic differences to improve students' comprehension and proficiency. However, limitations of this study include a focus on one Minahasa dialect, which limits generalizability. In addition, this study relied on a small sample of native speakers, which may not be fully representative of the wider language community. Future research should consider a wider sample and explore the impact of these morphological differences in a multilingual context.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(3)
University of Debrecen (HU), Institute of Anthropology and Ethnography (RU), Institute of Ethnology (HU), Sam Ratulangi University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.