Effectiveness of Mock Board Examination in Enhancing Academic Preparedness for LECPA of Fourth-Year Accountancy Students at Laguna University

This study examined the effectiveness of mock board examinations in enhancing academic preparedness for the Licensure Examination for Certified Public Accountants (LECPA) among fourth-year accountancy students at Laguna University. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of mock board examinations on students academic preparedness for the LECPA. The study employed a quantitative correlational design, involving 63 fourth-year accountancy students who participated in a mock board examination during the 2023-2024 academic year. A survey questionnaire, distributed via Google Forms, was used to collect data. The data were analyzed using statistical methods, including mean, standard deviation, and kendalls tau correlation, to determine the significant relationship between the mock board examination and the students academic preparedness for the LECPA. The findings revealed a high level of agreement regarding the mock exams duration of preparation, scope and coverage, and difficulty. Longer preparation periods, comprehensive scope and coverage of the six board subjects, and appropriate level of difficulty for mock board examinations demonstrated a strong correlation with improved academic performance and results. The study also found that students demonstrated high academic preparedness across six board subjects (FAR, AFAR, RFBT, TAX, MAS, and AUD), with TAX and AUD receiving the highest scores for content familiarity and subject mastery, and TAX, RFBT, and AUD for time management skills. In contrast, MAS earned the lowest scores for content familiarity, subject mastery, and time management skills. Correlation analysis showed moderate to strong positive relationships between mock board examination factors (duration of preparation, scope and coverage, and difficulty level) and improvements in content familiarity, subject mastery, and time management skills. This suggests that mock exams are effective in enhancing academic preparedness for LECPA. Based on the findings, the researchers suggested extending the preparation period, implementing self-based and faculty-based assessments, and exploring future research on emotional, financial, and social preparedness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research Publications
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001701420257793
Primary Topic
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Mock Board Examination in Enhancing Academic Preparedness for LECPA of Fourth-Year Accountancy Students at Laguna University

Magdalena Suárez-Ortega, Anne Kelly M. Greganda, Shery E. Pastidio, Kristelle M. Delizo et al.
International Journal of Research Publications
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
article

Effectiveness of Mock Board Examination in Enhancing Academic Preparedness for LECPA of Fourth-Year Accountancy Students at Laguna University

Magdalena Suárez-Ortega, Anne Kelly M. Greganda, Shery E. Pastidio, Kristelle M. Delizo, Marichelle A. Cresencio, Marian G. Magcalas
article en

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of mock board examinations in enhancing academic preparedness for the Licensure Examination for Certified Public Accountants (LECPA) among fourth-year accountancy students at Laguna University. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of mock board examinations on students academic preparedness for the LECPA. The study employed a quantitative correlational design, involving 63 fourth-year accountancy students who participated in a mock board examination during the 2023-2024 academic year. A survey questionnaire, distributed via Google Forms, was used to collect data. The data were analyzed using statistical methods, including mean, standard deviation, and kendalls tau correlation, to determine the significant relationship between the mock board examination and the students academic preparedness for the LECPA. The findings revealed a high level of agreement regarding the mock exams duration of preparation, scope and coverage, and difficulty. Longer preparation periods, comprehensive scope and coverage of the six board subjects, and appropriate level of difficulty for mock board examinations demonstrated a strong correlation with improved academic performance and results. The study also found that students demonstrated high academic preparedness across six board subjects (FAR, AFAR, RFBT, TAX, MAS, and AUD), with TAX and AUD receiving the highest scores for content familiarity and subject mastery, and TAX, RFBT, and AUD for time management skills. In contrast, MAS earned the lowest scores for content familiarity, subject mastery, and time management skills. Correlation analysis showed moderate to strong positive relationships between mock board examination factors (duration of preparation, scope and coverage, and difficulty level) and improvements in content familiarity, subject mastery, and time management skills. This suggests that mock exams are effective in enhancing academic preparedness for LECPA. Based on the findings, the researchers suggested extending the preparation period, implementing self-based and faculty-based assessments, and exploring future research on emotional, financial, and social preparedness.

International Journal of Research PublicationsVol. 170(1)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.