Prompt Scoring System for Dialog Summarization

Recent advancements in language processing have demonstrated the advanced capabilities of language models. Particularly noteworthy is the heightened prowess of pre-trained large language models in tackling tasks that were a real challenge a few years ago, such as the abstractive summarization of dialogs. An approach to generating summaries involves engineering prompt templates. The easiest way would be by using a static prompt, but it can lead to unreliable outcomes for different classes of dialogs. We implemented a scoring system to enhance the performance of a few-shot training. This involves constructing finely tuned prompts composed of dialog samples with the highest scores. The scoring process is grounded in a set of heuristics that specifically assess the structure and content of the dialogs. The use of the scoring system resulted in enhanced ROUGE scores and positive evaluations from human assessors. These promising results were consistently validated across all three large-scale datasets used in the testing phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30504554251321829
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prompt Scoring System for Dialog Summarization

George Pantelimon Prodan, Elena Pelican
The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence
Topic Modeling
article

Prompt Scoring System for Dialog Summarization

George Pantelimon Prodan, Elena Pelican
article en

Abstract

Recent advancements in language processing have demonstrated the advanced capabilities of language models. Particularly noteworthy is the heightened prowess of pre-trained large language models in tackling tasks that were a real challenge a few years ago, such as the abstractive summarization of dialogs. An approach to generating summaries involves engineering prompt templates. The easiest way would be by using a static prompt, but it can lead to unreliable outcomes for different classes of dialogs. We implemented a scoring system to enhance the performance of a few-shot training. This involves constructing finely tuned prompts composed of dialog samples with the highest scores. The scoring process is grounded in a set of heuristics that specifically assess the structure and content of the dialogs. The use of the scoring system resulted in enhanced ROUGE scores and positive evaluations from human assessors. These promising results were consistently validated across all three large-scale datasets used in the testing phase.

The European Journal on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 38(3)
Ovidius University (RO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.