Additional Predators (Nonhosts) and a New Amphibian Host of the Digenetic Trematode Cercaria of Proterometra macrostoma in Laboratory Experiments

The consumption of digenetic trematode cercariae by nonhosts can affect energy transfer in aquatic ecosystems and simultaneously reduce the numbers of these infectious agents. Recently, crayfish (i.e., Faxonius juvenilis and Procambarus spp.) were documented as predators/nonhosts of the digenetic trematode cercaria of Proterometra macrostoma in laboratory experiments. The objective of this study was to assess additional invertebrate and vertebrate predators of this cercaria species during experiments, which included blue dasher dragonfly nymphs (Pachydiplax longipennis), orange bluet damselfly nymphs (Enallagma signatum), mosquitofish (Gambusia sp.), and Cope's gray tree frog tadpoles (Hyla chrysoscelis). Individuals of each species were divided into 2 groups and exposed to 2 levels of 2–3-hr-old cercariae in 10.8-cm culture dishes filled with 200 ml of spring water. The high exposure (HE; 4–6 cercariae/predator) level was approximately 2× the number of cercariae compared to the low exposure (LE; 2–3 cercariae/predator) level. All 4 potential predators ingested cercariae, but in terms of the average percentage of cercariae consumed following 7 hr of exposure in the LE and HE trials, Gambusia sp. (LE = 83.3%; HE = 80%) appeared to be the most successful predator, followed by P. longipennis (LE = 67%; HE = 45%), E. signatum (LE = 41.7%; HE = 33.3%), and H. chrysoscelis (LE = 20.8%; HE = 37.5%). There was a significant difference in the mean number of cercariae consumed after 7 hr postexposure (PE) in the LE vs. HE groups for Gambusia sp. For both Gambusia sp. and P. longipennis, LE and HE groups ingested the majority of the cercariae to which they were exposed within the first hour. By comparison, a more gradual consumption was noted for E. signatum and H. chrysoscelis. Living distomes of P. macrostoma were recovered from H. chrysoscelis stomachs following ingestion on days 1 and 6 PE. This suggests that some amphibians may serve as definitive hosts for this parasite, which has only previously been reported from centrarchid fish. Collectively, these results suggest a broad food niche for P. macrostoma cercariae in aquatic food webs with regard to nonhosts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Parasitology
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1654/copa-d-24-00026
Primary Topic
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional Predators (Nonhosts) and a New Amphibian Host of the Digenetic Trematode Cercaria of Proterometra macrostoma in Laboratory Experiments

Melanie Andrews, Hannah J. Jackson, Bernadette Kwisera, Yogesh Budhathoki et al.
Comparative Parasitology
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
article

Additional Predators (Nonhosts) and a New Amphibian Host of the Digenetic Trematode Cercaria of Proterometra macrostoma in Laboratory Experiments

Melanie Andrews, Hannah J. Jackson, Bernadette Kwisera, Yogesh Budhathoki, Sarah Staat, Joseph Mecham, Ronald Rosen
article en

Abstract

The consumption of digenetic trematode cercariae by nonhosts can affect energy transfer in aquatic ecosystems and simultaneously reduce the numbers of these infectious agents. Recently, crayfish (i.e., Faxonius juvenilis and Procambarus spp.) were documented as predators/nonhosts of the digenetic trematode cercaria of Proterometra macrostoma in laboratory experiments. The objective of this study was to assess additional invertebrate and vertebrate predators of this cercaria species during experiments, which included blue dasher dragonfly nymphs (Pachydiplax longipennis), orange bluet damselfly nymphs (Enallagma signatum), mosquitofish (Gambusia sp.), and Cope's gray tree frog tadpoles (Hyla chrysoscelis). Individuals of each species were divided into 2 groups and exposed to 2 levels of 2–3-hr-old cercariae in 10.8-cm culture dishes filled with 200 ml of spring water. The high exposure (HE; 4–6 cercariae/predator) level was approximately 2× the number of cercariae compared to the low exposure (LE; 2–3 cercariae/predator) level. All 4 potential predators ingested cercariae, but in terms of the average percentage of cercariae consumed following 7 hr of exposure in the LE and HE trials, Gambusia sp. (LE = 83.3%; HE = 80%) appeared to be the most successful predator, followed by P. longipennis (LE = 67%; HE = 45%), E. signatum (LE = 41.7%; HE = 33.3%), and H. chrysoscelis (LE = 20.8%; HE = 37.5%). There was a significant difference in the mean number of cercariae consumed after 7 hr postexposure (PE) in the LE vs. HE groups for Gambusia sp. For both Gambusia sp. and P. longipennis, LE and HE groups ingested the majority of the cercariae to which they were exposed within the first hour. By comparison, a more gradual consumption was noted for E. signatum and H. chrysoscelis. Living distomes of P. macrostoma were recovered from H. chrysoscelis stomachs following ingestion on days 1 and 6 PE. This suggests that some amphibians may serve as definitive hosts for this parasite, which has only previously been reported from centrarchid fish. Collectively, these results suggest a broad food niche for P. macrostoma cercariae in aquatic food webs with regard to nonhosts.

Comparative ParasitologyVol. 92(1)
Berea College (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.