Generating textual explanations for scheduling systems leveraging the reasoning capabilities of large language models

Abstract Scheduling systems are critical for planning projects, resources, and activities across many industries to achieve goals efficiently. As scheduling requirements grow in complexity, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions has received more attention. However, providing comprehensible explanations of these decision-making processes remains a challenge and blocker to adoption. The emergent field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to address this by establishing human-centric interpretation of influencing factors for machine decisions. The leading field of autonomous interpretation in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is Large Language Model (LLM)s, for their generalist knowledge and reasoning capabilities. To explore LLMs’ potential to generate explanations for scheduling queries, we selected a benchmark set of Job Shop scheduling problems. A novel framework that integrates the selected language models, GPT-4 and Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA), into scheduling systems is introduced, facilitating human-like explanations to queries from different categories through few-shot learning. The explanations were analysed for accuracy, consistency, completeness, conciseness, and language across different scheduling problem sizes and complexities. The approach achieved an overall accuracy of 59% with GPT-4 and 35% with LLaMA, with minimal impact from the varied schedule sizes observed, proving the approach can handle different datasets and is performance scalable. Several responses demonstrated high comprehension of complex queries; however, response quality fluctuated due to the few-shot learning approach. This study establishes a baseline for measuring generalist LLM capabilities in handling explanations for autonomous scheduling systems, with promising results for an LLM providing XAI interactions to explain scheduling decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-025-00940-w
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating textual explanations for scheduling systems leveraging the reasoning capabilities of large language models

Cheyenne Powell, Annalisa Riccardi
8 citations
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
19.85
article

Generating textual explanations for scheduling systems leveraging the reasoning capabilities of large language models

Cheyenne Powell, Annalisa Riccardi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Scheduling systems are critical for planning projects, resources, and activities across many industries to achieve goals efficiently. As scheduling requirements grow in complexity, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions has received more attention. However, providing comprehensible explanations of these decision-making processes remains a challenge and blocker to adoption. The emergent field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to address this by establishing human-centric interpretation of influencing factors for machine decisions. The leading field of autonomous interpretation in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is Large Language Model (LLM)s, for their generalist knowledge and reasoning capabilities. To explore LLMs’ potential to generate explanations for scheduling queries, we selected a benchmark set of Job Shop scheduling problems. A novel framework that integrates the selected language models, GPT-4 and Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA), into scheduling systems is introduced, facilitating human-like explanations to queries from different categories through few-shot learning. The explanations were analysed for accuracy, consistency, completeness, conciseness, and language across different scheduling problem sizes and complexities. The approach achieved an overall accuracy of 59% with GPT-4 and 35% with LLaMA, with minimal impact from the varied schedule sizes observed, proving the approach can handle different datasets and is performance scalable. Several responses demonstrated high comprehension of complex queries; however, response quality fluctuated due to the few-shot learning approach. This study establishes a baseline for measuring generalist LLM capabilities in handling explanations for autonomous scheduling systems, with promising results for an LLM providing XAI interactions to explain scheduling decisions.

Journal of Intelligent Information SystemsVol. 63(4)
University of Strathclyde (GB)
European Space Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generating textual explanations for scheduling systems leveraging the reasoning capabilities of large language models — Cheyenne Powell, Annalisa Riccardi · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS