Effects of back muscle fatigue and modified trunk inertia on lumbar kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity during walking

Back endurance is a strong predictor of back pain, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship are not clear. Fatigue reduces muscles' force-generating capacity, so greater fatigability may increase lumbar motion and loading and trunk muscle co-contraction. Using a novel pack to modify inertia, we tested the effect of back fatigue and increased trunk inertia on lumbar kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity during walking. Lumbar kinematic and kinetic amplitudes and maximum muscle activity were measured per stride across four conditions: pre- and post-fatigue, with and without increased trunk inertia. The pack caused increases in maximum lumbar erector spinae (ES) activity by 3.19 times the average value calculated during the pre-fatigue no-pack trial (P<0.001), amplitude of lumbar flexion-extension moment by 0.0189 N m (kg g m)-1 (P<0.001), lumbar lateral bending moment by 0.0028 N m (kg g m)-1 (P=0.019) and lumbar axial rotation moment by 0.0203 N m (kg g m)-1 (P<0.001), and decreases in the amplitude of roll angle by 1.31 deg and yaw angle by 6.65 deg (both P<0.001). Back endurance is positively associated with change in maximum lumbar ES activity (r=0.69, P=0.013) and negatively associated with change in maximum rectus abdominus (RA) activity (r=-0.72, P=0.008) and lumbar flexion-extension moment amplitude (r=-0.62, P=0.031). Overall, individuals with less back endurance had increased maximum RA activity and sagittal kinetics post-fatigue whereas individuals with higher back endurance showed the opposite response. Increased RA activity with less back endurance may be a protective mechanism for stabilizing the trunk in response to increased sagittal lumbar loading due to fatigue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250479
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of back muscle fatigue and modified trunk inertia on lumbar kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity during walking

Benjamin E. Sibson, Daniel E. Lieberman, Ali Yawar, Andrew K. Yegian
2 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
article

Effects of back muscle fatigue and modified trunk inertia on lumbar kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity during walking

Benjamin E. Sibson, Daniel E. Lieberman, Ali Yawar, Andrew K. Yegian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Back endurance is a strong predictor of back pain, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship are not clear. Fatigue reduces muscles' force-generating capacity, so greater fatigability may increase lumbar motion and loading and trunk muscle co-contraction. Using a novel pack to modify inertia, we tested the effect of back fatigue and increased trunk inertia on lumbar kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity during walking. Lumbar kinematic and kinetic amplitudes and maximum muscle activity were measured per stride across four conditions: pre- and post-fatigue, with and without increased trunk inertia. The pack caused increases in maximum lumbar erector spinae (ES) activity by 3.19 times the average value calculated during the pre-fatigue no-pack trial (P<0.001), amplitude of lumbar flexion-extension moment by 0.0189 N m (kg g m)-1 (P<0.001), lumbar lateral bending moment by 0.0028 N m (kg g m)-1 (P=0.019) and lumbar axial rotation moment by 0.0203 N m (kg g m)-1 (P<0.001), and decreases in the amplitude of roll angle by 1.31 deg and yaw angle by 6.65 deg (both P<0.001). Back endurance is positively associated with change in maximum lumbar ES activity (r=0.69, P=0.013) and negatively associated with change in maximum rectus abdominus (RA) activity (r=-0.72, P=0.008) and lumbar flexion-extension moment amplitude (r=-0.62, P=0.031). Overall, individuals with less back endurance had increased maximum RA activity and sagittal kinetics post-fatigue whereas individuals with higher back endurance showed the opposite response. Increased RA activity with less back endurance may be a protective mechanism for stabilizing the trunk in response to increased sagittal lumbar loading due to fatigue.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 228(9)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US)
Harvard University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.