The Canadian <i>Species at Risk Act</i> at 20: an aquatic perspective

I reflect upon how successful the implementation of the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA), enacted in 2002, has been at meeting its intended purposes of protecting and recovering at-risk species through the implementation of the five-step SARA process, particularly as it relates to aquatic species at risk. For each one of the steps, I identify shortcomings and provide recommendations to overcome those challenges. The overall implementation of the SARA process has fallen far short of incorporating Indigenous knowledge as outlined in Act, dealt poorly with climate change, and underestimated the need for Western science at each step in the process. Addressing these challenges would require large increases in funding, as current funding is woefully inadequate to undertake current legislated requirements of SARA, let alone the aspirational goals of actually recovering species. Despite these challenges, the Act we have is better than the alternative of no Act at all and that many species have benefitted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACETS
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2024-0156
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Canadian Species at Risk Act at 20: an aquatic perspective

Nicholas E. Mandrak
4 citations
FACETS
Environmental Conservation and Management
9.69
article

The Canadian Species at Risk Act at 20: an aquatic perspective

Nicholas E. Mandrak
article en
4 citations

Abstract

I reflect upon how successful the implementation of the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA), enacted in 2002, has been at meeting its intended purposes of protecting and recovering at-risk species through the implementation of the five-step SARA process, particularly as it relates to aquatic species at risk. For each one of the steps, I identify shortcomings and provide recommendations to overcome those challenges. The overall implementation of the SARA process has fallen far short of incorporating Indigenous knowledge as outlined in Act, dealt poorly with climate change, and underestimated the need for Western science at each step in the process. Addressing these challenges would require large increases in funding, as current funding is woefully inadequate to undertake current legislated requirements of SARA, let alone the aspirational goals of actually recovering species. Despite these challenges, the Act we have is better than the alternative of no Act at all and that many species have benefitted.

FACETSVol. 10
University of Toronto (CA), Scarborough Health Network (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Conservation and Management
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Canadian <i>Species at Risk Act</i> at 20: an aquatic perspective — Nicholas E. Mandrak · FACETS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS