Disciplining Labour: Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Georgia

This article contributes to growing debates on the relationship between neoliberalism and authoritarianism by investigating labour disenfranchisement processes in Georgia from independence up to the early 2020s. In contrast to prevailing approaches that separate the analysis of authoritarianism in former Soviet states from questions of political economy, the article unpacks the authoritarian mechanisms deployed by successive governments over the last three decades to discipline labour. The article identifies repression, punitiveness and constitutionalisation of austerity as mechanisms that have undermined the organisational potential of labour, forced workers into flexible employment and entrenched social precarity, with the aim of suppressing wages, securing neoliberal reforms and attracting foreign capital.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Europe Asia Studies
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2025.2483258
Primary Topic
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplining Labour: Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Georgia

Konstantine Eristavi
Europe Asia Studies
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
article

Disciplining Labour: Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Georgia

Konstantine Eristavi
article en

Abstract

This article contributes to growing debates on the relationship between neoliberalism and authoritarianism by investigating labour disenfranchisement processes in Georgia from independence up to the early 2020s. In contrast to prevailing approaches that separate the analysis of authoritarianism in former Soviet states from questions of political economy, the article unpacks the authoritarian mechanisms deployed by successive governments over the last three decades to discipline labour. The article identifies repression, punitiveness and constitutionalisation of austerity as mechanisms that have undermined the organisational potential of labour, forced workers into flexible employment and entrenched social precarity, with the aim of suppressing wages, securing neoliberal reforms and attracting foreign capital.

Europe Asia StudiesVol. 77(3)
Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.