Research on Optimization of Low-carbon Eco-city Indicator System in China from International Comparison Perspective

This paper, guided by the goals of “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality,” examines the Low-carbon Eco-city index systems of developed countries through international comparison. It identifies key points for constructing China’s own index system under these goals and proposes a framework for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city system. A comparison is made between the China-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Version 2.0 and Bristol’s urban development index, focusing on the index framework and specific data. The analysis highlights both similarities and differences. By drawing on Bristol’s approach, it suggests increasing the share of renewable energy, developing clean energy, green building materials, renewable energy technologies, and smart technologies, while improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions, and enhancing carbon sink capacity. Based on these findings, relevant strategies for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city index system are proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
E3S Web of Conferences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562501013
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Optimization of Low-carbon Eco-city Indicator System in China from International Comparison Perspective

Tingting Guo, Wenhao Li, Siyu Hu, Jingmei Shao et al.
E3S Web of Conferences
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Research on Optimization of Low-carbon Eco-city Indicator System in China from International Comparison Perspective

Tingting Guo, Wenhao Li, Siyu Hu, Jingmei Shao, Wei Fan, Yan Long, X. Pu
article en

Abstract

This paper, guided by the goals of “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality,” examines the Low-carbon Eco-city index systems of developed countries through international comparison. It identifies key points for constructing China’s own index system under these goals and proposes a framework for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city system. A comparison is made between the China-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Version 2.0 and Bristol’s urban development index, focusing on the index framework and specific data. The analysis highlights both similarities and differences. By drawing on Bristol’s approach, it suggests increasing the share of renewable energy, developing clean energy, green building materials, renewable energy technologies, and smart technologies, while improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions, and enhancing carbon sink capacity. Based on these findings, relevant strategies for optimizing China’s Low-carbon Eco-city index system are proposed.

E3S Web of ConferencesVol. 625
Wuhan University (CN), Hubei Urban Construction Vocational and Technological College (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Hubei Provincial Department of Education, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.