Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S.

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection in Investigating and Improving Quantum Education through Research.] The modern physics course is a crucial gateway for physics majors as it provides an introduction to concepts beyond the scope of the K-12 education. This study collected 167 modern physics syllabi from 127 U.S. research-intensive institutions using publicly available syllabi (51.5%) and private correspondence (48.5%). Due to the size of the corpus being large enough for natural language processing (NLP) to provide significant insight into the curricular content of a course, but still being small enough for human analysis to remain feasible, both NLP and human-analysis methods were utilized. The use of both methods provided a way to test the newly introduced method of NLP in physics education research and offered a novel tool for cross-validation. Public course catalogs were consulted to identify prerequisites and corequisites with 89.3% of students having completed a course in calculus II or higher. Foundational topics like Newtonian mechanics (94%), electricity and magnetism (84.4%), and waves or optics (77.2%) were frequently required. Most institutions consistently taught quantum physics (94%), atomic physics (83%), and relativity (70%), but there was variability in the inclusion of other topics alongside these three main topics. The study highlights the current modern physics curricula at U.S. research-intensive institutions, emphasizing the importance of a consistent and comprehensive education for physics majors across universities. This insight contributes to the ongoing discourse on optimizing physics education in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.21.010139
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S.

Timothy J. Atherton, Ramón S. Barthelemy, Alexis Buzzell
5 citations
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
44.63
article

Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S.

Timothy J. Atherton, Ramón S. Barthelemy, Alexis Buzzell
article en
5 citations

Abstract

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection in Investigating and Improving Quantum Education through Research.] The modern physics course is a crucial gateway for physics majors as it provides an introduction to concepts beyond the scope of the K-12 education. This study collected 167 modern physics syllabi from 127 U.S. research-intensive institutions using publicly available syllabi (51.5%) and private correspondence (48.5%). Due to the size of the corpus being large enough for natural language processing (NLP) to provide significant insight into the curricular content of a course, but still being small enough for human analysis to remain feasible, both NLP and human-analysis methods were utilized. The use of both methods provided a way to test the newly introduced method of NLP in physics education research and offered a novel tool for cross-validation. Public course catalogs were consulted to identify prerequisites and corequisites with 89.3% of students having completed a course in calculus II or higher. Foundational topics like Newtonian mechanics (94%), electricity and magnetism (84.4%), and waves or optics (77.2%) were frequently required. Most institutions consistently taught quantum physics (94%), atomic physics (83%), and relativity (70%), but there was variability in the inclusion of other topics alongside these three main topics. The study highlights the current modern physics curricula at U.S. research-intensive institutions, emphasizing the importance of a consistent and comprehensive education for physics majors across universities. This insight contributes to the ongoing discourse on optimizing physics education in higher education.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 21(1)
Tufts University (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Science Education and Pedagogy
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S. — Timothy J. Atherton, Ramón S. Barthelemy, et al. · Physical Review Physics Education Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS