Comparative Analysis of Anesthesia Techniques and Circumcision Methods on Pain Outcomes in Pediatric Mass Circumcision: An Observational Study

Circumcision is a common procedure in Indonesia, often performed in mass settings. The associated pain can lead to significant psychological distress in children. Effective pain management is crucial but often challenging in mass circumcision events. This study aimed to identify determinants of pain intensity, specifically comparing anesthesia techniques and circumcision methods, during pediatric mass circumcision. An observational study was conducted in February 2023 involving 56 male children aged 0-10 years undergoing mass circumcision in Bandung and Cirebon, Indonesia. Data collected included anesthesia technique (needle-free injection [NFI], injection, topical + NFI), anesthetic agent (lidocaine vs. lidocaine/pehacain mix), circumcision method (guillotine with thermocautery vs. modified dorsal slit clamp with electrosurgery), presence of phimosis, and event location. Pain was assessed intraoperatively using age-appropriate scales: Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) for 0-<2 years, Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale for 2-7 years, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for >7 years. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 to identify factors significantly correlated with pain scores. The mean age was 4.07 years (SD ± 2.75), and 78.6% had a history of phimosis. The mean pain score was 2.66 (SD ± 2.5) on relevant scales. Multivariate analysis revealed that both anesthesia technique (p=0.010) and circumcision method (p=0.000) were significantly correlated with pain scores, with a moderate overall correlation (R=0.500). Specifically, the modified clamp method was associated with significantly higher pain scores compared to the guillotine method (B=2.719). Combined topical and NFI anesthesia was associated with lower pain scores compared to other techniques (B=-1.059). In conclusion, anesthesia technique and circumcision method are significant determinants of intraoperative pain during pediatric mass circumcision. Less invasive anesthesia approaches (topical + NFI) combined with methods involving less tissue manipulation and shorter duration (guillotine with thermocautery) were associated with lower pain scores. These findings suggest that careful selection of techniques can significantly improve the pediatric experience in mass circumcision settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijmr.v5i2.738
Primary Topic
Genital Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Anesthesia Techniques and Circumcision Methods on Pain Outcomes in Pediatric Mass Circumcision: An Observational Study

Ridwansyah Ridwansyah, Rakhmad Hidayat, Catur Rizky Kurniawan, Alifan Haqi et al.
Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews
Genital Health and Disease
article

Comparative Analysis of Anesthesia Techniques and Circumcision Methods on Pain Outcomes in Pediatric Mass Circumcision: An Observational Study

Ridwansyah Ridwansyah, Rakhmad Hidayat, Catur Rizky Kurniawan, Alifan Haqi, Reza Armasyah Soenendar
article en

Abstract

Circumcision is a common procedure in Indonesia, often performed in mass settings. The associated pain can lead to significant psychological distress in children. Effective pain management is crucial but often challenging in mass circumcision events. This study aimed to identify determinants of pain intensity, specifically comparing anesthesia techniques and circumcision methods, during pediatric mass circumcision. An observational study was conducted in February 2023 involving 56 male children aged 0-10 years undergoing mass circumcision in Bandung and Cirebon, Indonesia. Data collected included anesthesia technique (needle-free injection [NFI], injection, topical + NFI), anesthetic agent (lidocaine vs. lidocaine/pehacain mix), circumcision method (guillotine with thermocautery vs. modified dorsal slit clamp with electrosurgery), presence of phimosis, and event location. Pain was assessed intraoperatively using age-appropriate scales: Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) for 0-<2 years, Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale for 2-7 years, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for >7 years. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 to identify factors significantly correlated with pain scores. The mean age was 4.07 years (SD ± 2.75), and 78.6% had a history of phimosis. The mean pain score was 2.66 (SD ± 2.5) on relevant scales. Multivariate analysis revealed that both anesthesia technique (p=0.010) and circumcision method (p=0.000) were significantly correlated with pain scores, with a moderate overall correlation (R=0.500). Specifically, the modified clamp method was associated with significantly higher pain scores compared to the guillotine method (B=2.719). Combined topical and NFI anesthesia was associated with lower pain scores compared to other techniques (B=-1.059). In conclusion, anesthesia technique and circumcision method are significant determinants of intraoperative pain during pediatric mass circumcision. Less invasive anesthesia approaches (topical + NFI) combined with methods involving less tissue manipulation and shorter duration (guillotine with thermocautery) were associated with lower pain scores. These findings suggest that careful selection of techniques can significantly improve the pediatric experience in mass circumcision settings.

Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical ReviewsVol. 5(2)
President University (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon (ID), Universitas Bojonegoro (ID), Public Risk Management Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Genital Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.