Contemporary responses in Africa to the aftermath of death: developments and decolonising challenges

Dominated by scholars and empirical material from Europe, North America, New Zealand and Australia, death and bereavement studies have often assumed the universality of their knowledge. This limits the epistemic and ontological potential of the field and can result in limiting understanding of death and its aftermath ‘elsewhere’. Further, because of the political and economic power of these centres for the study of death, it has also resulted in the imposition of Western knowledges and practices about death on populations in Africa through colonial rule and neo-colonial aid, development initiatives, and global health policies. We advocate for the decolonisation of death and ‘bereavement’ studies by which we do not mean a return to a pre-colonial past, but instead the embracing of a plurality of epistemologies and ontologies about death and its aftermath, and a recognition of the power embedded in all claims about the meaning and processes of death in the continuing lives of the living. We explore these themes through a focus on three case studies in Senegal, South Sudan and Uganda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mortality
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2025.2477611
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary responses in Africa to the aftermath of death: developments and decolonising challenges

Sylvia Nannyonga‐Tamusuza, Dennis Klass, Naomi Pendle, Ruth Evans et al.
2 citations
Mortality
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
4.61
article

Contemporary responses in Africa to the aftermath of death: developments and decolonising challenges

Sylvia Nannyonga‐Tamusuza, Dennis Klass, Naomi Pendle, Ruth Evans, Jane Ribbens McCarthy, Henry Okidi Okoth, Jedeit Jal Riek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dominated by scholars and empirical material from Europe, North America, New Zealand and Australia, death and bereavement studies have often assumed the universality of their knowledge. This limits the epistemic and ontological potential of the field and can result in limiting understanding of death and its aftermath ‘elsewhere’. Further, because of the political and economic power of these centres for the study of death, it has also resulted in the imposition of Western knowledges and practices about death on populations in Africa through colonial rule and neo-colonial aid, development initiatives, and global health policies. We advocate for the decolonisation of death and ‘bereavement’ studies by which we do not mean a return to a pre-colonial past, but instead the embracing of a plurality of epistemologies and ontologies about death and its aftermath, and a recognition of the power embedded in all claims about the meaning and processes of death in the continuing lives of the living. We explore these themes through a focus on three case studies in Senegal, South Sudan and Uganda.

MortalityVol. 30(2)
The Open University (GB), University of Bath (GB), University of Reading (GB), Makerere University (UG)
UK Research and Innovation, Leverhulme Trust, Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contemporary responses in Africa to the aftermath of death: developments and decolonising challenges — Sylvia Nannyonga‐Tamusuza, Dennis Klass, et al. · Mortality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS