Association of a Veterans Affairs Toxic Exposure Medical Evaluation with Symptom-Related Care

<b>Rationale:</b> Service members exposed to burn pit emissions may be at risk for adverse health outcomes. The Department of Veterans Affairs offers screening medical evaluations for these individuals, but the benefit of this strategy is unknown. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine the effect of a medical evaluation for Veterans participating in the Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry (AHOBPR), the national registry program for service members exposed to burn pit emissions. <b>Methods:</b> We selected all Veterans who participated in the AHOBPR and requested a medical evaluation from 2016 to 2020. We identified cohorts of Veterans who self-reported symptoms on a registry questionnaire of possible cardiovascular, pulmonary, or sinus disease. Participants who completed the medical evaluation were matched by high-dimensional propensity score to those who instead completed a primary care visit. For each cohort, the primary outcome was the receipt of additional care consistent with that disease category, defined as the occurrence of a symptom-related diagnostic test or establishment of care in an associated specialty clinic. In an exploratory analysis, we also determined whether completing the AHOBPR medical evaluation was associated with a shorter time to diagnosis of new medical conditions. The relationship between completion of the medical evaluation and study outcomes was estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression. <b>Results:</b> We identified 27,192 Veterans who requested a medical evaluation, of whom 63% reported symptoms of possible cardiovascular disease, 25% of pulmonary disease, and 43% of sinus disease. After matching, the medical evaluation was associated with a higher hazard of receiving care for cardiovascular (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.51), pulmonary (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.39-1.80), and sinus disease (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.56). In a symptom-agnostic exploratory analysis, the medical evaluation was associated with a similar time to diagnosis of most medical conditions compared with the primary care visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> Among Veterans with symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or sinus disease, the AHOBPR medical evaluation was associated with a shorter time to receipt of symptom-related care compared with a primary care visit. A purpose-built toxic exposure medical evaluation appears to be an effective strategy to improve the identification of conditions that may be related to military exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202408-835oc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of a Veterans Affairs Toxic Exposure Medical Evaluation with Symptom-Related Care

Tianshi David Wu, Danielle Guffey, Mhd Hasan Almekdash, Drew A. Helmer et al.
1 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Association of a Veterans Affairs Toxic Exposure Medical Evaluation with Symptom-Related Care

Tianshi David Wu, Danielle Guffey, Mhd Hasan Almekdash, Drew A. Helmer, Israel C. Christie, Jaehwan Han
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Service members exposed to burn pit emissions may be at risk for adverse health outcomes. The Department of Veterans Affairs offers screening medical evaluations for these individuals, but the benefit of this strategy is unknown. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine the effect of a medical evaluation for Veterans participating in the Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry (AHOBPR), the national registry program for service members exposed to burn pit emissions. <b>Methods:</b> We selected all Veterans who participated in the AHOBPR and requested a medical evaluation from 2016 to 2020. We identified cohorts of Veterans who self-reported symptoms on a registry questionnaire of possible cardiovascular, pulmonary, or sinus disease. Participants who completed the medical evaluation were matched by high-dimensional propensity score to those who instead completed a primary care visit. For each cohort, the primary outcome was the receipt of additional care consistent with that disease category, defined as the occurrence of a symptom-related diagnostic test or establishment of care in an associated specialty clinic. In an exploratory analysis, we also determined whether completing the AHOBPR medical evaluation was associated with a shorter time to diagnosis of new medical conditions. The relationship between completion of the medical evaluation and study outcomes was estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression. <b>Results:</b> We identified 27,192 Veterans who requested a medical evaluation, of whom 63% reported symptoms of possible cardiovascular disease, 25% of pulmonary disease, and 43% of sinus disease. After matching, the medical evaluation was associated with a higher hazard of receiving care for cardiovascular (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.51), pulmonary (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.39-1.80), and sinus disease (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.56). In a symptom-agnostic exploratory analysis, the medical evaluation was associated with a similar time to diagnosis of most medical conditions compared with the primary care visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> Among Veterans with symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or sinus disease, the AHOBPR medical evaluation was associated with a shorter time to receipt of symptom-related care compared with a primary care visit. A purpose-built toxic exposure medical evaluation appears to be an effective strategy to improve the identification of conditions that may be related to military exposures.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(8)
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Center for Innovation (US), Department of Health Services (NP)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.