Assisted reproductive technologies: non-obvious limits of protection

Since the adoption of the Russian Constitutional Court’s Decision No.756-O of 20 April 2023, a contentious issue has persisted in the Russian legal system concerning the possibility of using partial donation in a surrogacy program. In the present case the applicants (foreign nationals) challenged the provisions of Article 55(9) of Federal Law No.323 of 21 November 2011 “On the fundamentals of health protection of citizens in the Russian Federation”. At the time of the appeal, the contested norm stipulated that “surrogacy is the carrying and birth of a child (including premature birth) under a contract concluded between a surrogate mother (a woman carrying a foetus after transfer of a donor embryo) and potential parents whose sex cells were used for fertilisation, or a single woman for whom carrying and birth of a child is impossible for medical reasons”. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation initially accepted the applicants’ complaint, but then dismissed the case, having found no reason to believe that this very norm was the basis for refusing to satisfy the applicants’ legal claims for the transfer to them of children born under the surrogacy programme, given that the genetic material of only one of the parents (the father) was used in the programme. The article attempts to understand the reasons for this decision, the legal context within which the events unfolded, the substantive and procedural aspects contributing to this decision, as well as its possible consequences, taking into account the current regulation, which applies to Russian rather than foreign patients, but is still not entirely consistent. The authors draw attention to the risks of uncertainty and overly restrictive approaches in such a sensitive area as reproduction, analyzing in more detail the problem of discrimination on the basis of sex and health status, as well as the issue of preserving and strengthening family ties and the right of the child to family upbringing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2025-1-163-183
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assisted reproductive technologies: non-obvious limits of protection

Alexandra Troitskaya, Olga Shevchenko
1 citations
Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
article

Assisted reproductive technologies: non-obvious limits of protection

Alexandra Troitskaya, Olga Shevchenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the adoption of the Russian Constitutional Court’s Decision No.756-O of 20 April 2023, a contentious issue has persisted in the Russian legal system concerning the possibility of using partial donation in a surrogacy program. In the present case the applicants (foreign nationals) challenged the provisions of Article 55(9) of Federal Law No.323 of 21 November 2011 “On the fundamentals of health protection of citizens in the Russian Federation”. At the time of the appeal, the contested norm stipulated that “surrogacy is the carrying and birth of a child (including premature birth) under a contract concluded between a surrogate mother (a woman carrying a foetus after transfer of a donor embryo) and potential parents whose sex cells were used for fertilisation, or a single woman for whom carrying and birth of a child is impossible for medical reasons”. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation initially accepted the applicants’ complaint, but then dismissed the case, having found no reason to believe that this very norm was the basis for refusing to satisfy the applicants’ legal claims for the transfer to them of children born under the surrogacy programme, given that the genetic material of only one of the parents (the father) was used in the programme. The article attempts to understand the reasons for this decision, the legal context within which the events unfolded, the substantive and procedural aspects contributing to this decision, as well as its possible consequences, taking into account the current regulation, which applies to Russian rather than foreign patients, but is still not entirely consistent. The authors draw attention to the risks of uncertainty and overly restrictive approaches in such a sensitive area as reproduction, analyzing in more detail the problem of discrimination on the basis of sex and health status, as well as the issue of preserving and strengthening family ties and the right of the child to family upbringing.

Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenieVol. 34(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.