A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW: SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES

Seismic vulnerability assessment is a comprehensive process that involves evaluating the susceptibility of structures to potential damage or failure during seismic events. This assessment is crucial for understanding and mitigating the impact of earthquakes on structures. Still, it is necessary to emphasize that vulnerability assessment is not a singular procedure: it varies based on the scale of analysis and the specific goals of the assessment. Conducting such assessments requires significant technical expertise as well as human and financial resources, which are often limited. These challenges are particularly evident in historic urban areas due to the unique characteristics of historical buildings, including complex materials, construction techniques, and the difficulty of quantifying their cultural value and significance. Recent decades have seen significant advancements in vulnerability assessment methods, driven by technological progress in seismic event detection and structural analysis software. Previously, earthquake information was largely limited to qualitative descriptions in historical records. Methods for assessing structural vulnerability can be categorized into empirical, analytical, expert-based, or hybrid approaches. Initially, macroseismic methods were the most widely used. These methods are based on observed earthquake damage, making them relatively straightforward to apply, even on a larger scale. In contrast, analytical methods focus on determining the structural response, which requires more computational and time effort. Analytical methods are further divided into detailed and simplified approaches, with the latter split into three subgroups: collapse mechanism-based methods, capacity spectrum-based methods, and fully displacement-based methods. The paper discusses the existing vulnerability assessment methods presented by various authors, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of each and examining their practical applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5592/co/3crocee.2025.4
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW: SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES

Antonela Moretić, Karlo Ožić, Mislav Stepinac
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW: SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES

Antonela Moretić, Karlo Ožić, Mislav Stepinac
article en

Abstract

Seismic vulnerability assessment is a comprehensive process that involves evaluating the susceptibility of structures to potential damage or failure during seismic events. This assessment is crucial for understanding and mitigating the impact of earthquakes on structures. Still, it is necessary to emphasize that vulnerability assessment is not a singular procedure: it varies based on the scale of analysis and the specific goals of the assessment. Conducting such assessments requires significant technical expertise as well as human and financial resources, which are often limited. These challenges are particularly evident in historic urban areas due to the unique characteristics of historical buildings, including complex materials, construction techniques, and the difficulty of quantifying their cultural value and significance. Recent decades have seen significant advancements in vulnerability assessment methods, driven by technological progress in seismic event detection and structural analysis software. Previously, earthquake information was largely limited to qualitative descriptions in historical records. Methods for assessing structural vulnerability can be categorized into empirical, analytical, expert-based, or hybrid approaches. Initially, macroseismic methods were the most widely used. These methods are based on observed earthquake damage, making them relatively straightforward to apply, even on a larger scale. In contrast, analytical methods focus on determining the structural response, which requires more computational and time effort. Analytical methods are further divided into detailed and simplified approaches, with the latter split into three subgroups: collapse mechanism-based methods, capacity spectrum-based methods, and fully displacement-based methods. The paper discusses the existing vulnerability assessment methods presented by various authors, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of each and examining their practical applications.

Vol. 3
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.