Weighted envy-freeness for submodular valuations
Abstract We investigate the fair allocation of indivisible goods to agents with possibly different entitlements represented by weights. Previous work has shown that guarantees for additive valuations with existing envy-based notions cannot be extended to the case where agents have matroid-rank (i.e., binary submodular) valuations. We propose two families of envy-based notions for matroid-rank and general submodular valuations, one based on the idea of transferability and the other on marginal values. We show that our notions can be satisfied via generalizations of rules such as picking sequences and maximum weighted Nash welfare. In addition, we introduce welfare measures based on harmonic numbers, and show that variants of maximum weighted harmonic welfare offer stronger fairness guarantees than maximum weighted Nash welfare under matroid-rank valuations.
Authors
- Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9213-7746)
- Nicholas Teh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-466X)
- Luisa Montanari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-0290)
- Warut Suksompong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-2539)
Institutions
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Social Choice and Welfare
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01599-6
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.26
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- National University of Singapore
- Ministry of Education - Singapore
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Ministry of Education, India
- Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
- Division of Mathematical Sciences