Weighted envy-freeness for submodular valuations

Abstract We investigate the fair allocation of indivisible goods to agents with possibly different entitlements represented by weights. Previous work has shown that guarantees for additive valuations with existing envy-based notions cannot be extended to the case where agents have matroid-rank (i.e., binary submodular) valuations. We propose two families of envy-based notions for matroid-rank and general submodular valuations, one based on the idea of transferability and the other on marginal values. We show that our notions can be satisfied via generalizations of rules such as picking sequences and maximum weighted Nash welfare. In addition, we introduce welfare measures based on harmonic numbers, and show that variants of maximum weighted harmonic welfare offer stronger fairness guarantees than maximum weighted Nash welfare under matroid-rank valuations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01599-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted envy-freeness for submodular valuations

Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Nicholas Teh, Luisa Montanari, Warut Suksompong
2 citations
Social Choice and Welfare
Game Theory and Voting Systems
6.26
article

Weighted envy-freeness for submodular valuations

Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Nicholas Teh, Luisa Montanari, Warut Suksompong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the fair allocation of indivisible goods to agents with possibly different entitlements represented by weights. Previous work has shown that guarantees for additive valuations with existing envy-based notions cannot be extended to the case where agents have matroid-rank (i.e., binary submodular) valuations. We propose two families of envy-based notions for matroid-rank and general submodular valuations, one based on the idea of transferability and the other on marginal values. We show that our notions can be satisfied via generalizations of rules such as picking sequences and maximum weighted Nash welfare. In addition, we introduce welfare measures based on harmonic numbers, and show that variants of maximum weighted harmonic welfare offer stronger fairness guarantees than maximum weighted Nash welfare under matroid-rank valuations.

Social Choice and WelfareVol. 65(4)
National University of Singapore (SG), University of Oxford (GB), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
National Science Foundation, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, National University of Singapore, Ministry of Education - Singapore, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ministry of Education, India, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Division of Mathematical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Weighted envy-freeness for submodular valuations — Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Nicholas Teh, et al. · Social Choice and Welfare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS