Comparing Low-Income Disparities in Chronic Disease Health Education Between China and United States

Chronic disease management remains a significant public health challenge, with both China and the United States facing distinct challenges in delivering health education to low-income populations. This comparative analysis examines how these two different healthcare systems address health education disparities, focusing on institutional structures, delivery mechanisms, and accessibility. Through systematic review of previous research and policy documents from both countries, we analyze the strengths and limitations of each system's approach to chronic disease education. Our findings reveal that while each country has developed unique solutions - with China's extensive rural healthcare network and the US's community health center system - both face persistent challenges in reaching vulnerable populations. This analysis provides insights into how different healthcare systems address similar challenges in chronic disease education, contributing to the global dialogue on reducing health disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Natural Science
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2025.22165
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Low-Income Disparities in Chronic Disease Health Education Between China and United States

Quanwei Zhang
Theoretical and Natural Science
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Comparing Low-Income Disparities in Chronic Disease Health Education Between China and United States

Quanwei Zhang
article en

Abstract

Chronic disease management remains a significant public health challenge, with both China and the United States facing distinct challenges in delivering health education to low-income populations. This comparative analysis examines how these two different healthcare systems address health education disparities, focusing on institutional structures, delivery mechanisms, and accessibility. Through systematic review of previous research and policy documents from both countries, we analyze the strengths and limitations of each system's approach to chronic disease education. Our findings reveal that while each country has developed unique solutions - with China's extensive rural healthcare network and the US's community health center system - both face persistent challenges in reaching vulnerable populations. This analysis provides insights into how different healthcare systems address similar challenges in chronic disease education, contributing to the global dialogue on reducing health disparities.

Theoretical and Natural ScienceVol. 96(1)
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Low-Income Disparities in Chronic Disease Health Education Between China and United States — Quanwei Zhang · Theoretical and Natural Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS