The Rescue Obligation in Criminal Law: A Comparative Analysis of China and Germany
There are many debates about whether the rescue obligation should be codified in Chinese criminal law. This paper analyzes why rescue duties are enshrined in German criminal law but not in Chinese criminal law, using case studies and comparative analysis. The key legislative differences between the two countries are explored, focusing on the moral, legal, and societal implications of these obligations. The paper also examines the potential impact of introducing rescue obligations into Chinese criminal law, considering the cultural, legal, and practical challenges involved. Ultimately, the study concludes that while criminalizing the failure to rescue could improve social ethics and public safety, Chinas unique legal and social context requires careful consideration before adopting such a provision. The paper suggests that encouraging positive behavior through incentives, rather than punitive measures, may provide a more feasible approach within the current Chinese legal framework. The main research methods used in this paper are comparative research, case analysis, and normative analysis.
Authors
- Dongqing Lv (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-9596)
Institutions
- East China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.22266
- Primary Topic
- European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00