The Rescue Obligation in Criminal Law: A Comparative Analysis of China and Germany

There are many debates about whether the rescue obligation should be codified in Chinese criminal law. This paper analyzes why rescue duties are enshrined in German criminal law but not in Chinese criminal law, using case studies and comparative analysis. The key legislative differences between the two countries are explored, focusing on the moral, legal, and societal implications of these obligations. The paper also examines the potential impact of introducing rescue obligations into Chinese criminal law, considering the cultural, legal, and practical challenges involved. Ultimately, the study concludes that while criminalizing the failure to rescue could improve social ethics and public safety, Chinas unique legal and social context requires careful consideration before adopting such a provision. The paper suggests that encouraging positive behavior through incentives, rather than punitive measures, may provide a more feasible approach within the current Chinese legal framework. The main research methods used in this paper are comparative research, case analysis, and normative analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.22266
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rescue Obligation in Criminal Law: A Comparative Analysis of China and Germany

Dongqing Lv
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

The Rescue Obligation in Criminal Law: A Comparative Analysis of China and Germany

Dongqing Lv
article en

Abstract

There are many debates about whether the rescue obligation should be codified in Chinese criminal law. This paper analyzes why rescue duties are enshrined in German criminal law but not in Chinese criminal law, using case studies and comparative analysis. The key legislative differences between the two countries are explored, focusing on the moral, legal, and societal implications of these obligations. The paper also examines the potential impact of introducing rescue obligations into Chinese criminal law, considering the cultural, legal, and practical challenges involved. Ultimately, the study concludes that while criminalizing the failure to rescue could improve social ethics and public safety, Chinas unique legal and social context requires careful consideration before adopting such a provision. The paper suggests that encouraging positive behavior through incentives, rather than punitive measures, may provide a more feasible approach within the current Chinese legal framework. The main research methods used in this paper are comparative research, case analysis, and normative analysis.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 88(1)
East China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Rescue Obligation in Criminal Law: A Comparative Analysis of China and Germany — Dongqing Lv · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS