Gothenburg direct observation tool for assessing person-centred care (GDOT-PCC): evaluation of inter-rater reliability
ICC estimates for most domains were comparable to or exceeded those reported for similar direct observation tools for assessing PCC, suggesting that they may reliably be used in, for example, education and quality improvement applications. Reliability for the domains planning and documentation and documentation needs to be assessed in studies sampling more documentation behaviours. Reliability for the patient perspective domain may owe to methodological issues and should be reassessed in larger, better-designed studies.
Authors
- Charles Taft (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-4270)
- Nina Ekman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-5879)
- Andreas Fors (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8980-0538)
- Philip Moons (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-4516)
Institutions
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Region Västra Götaland (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Open
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096576
- Primary Topic
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Centrum fÖr Personcentrerad Vård