Preferences for couple-based smoking cessation interventions among couples who smoke: online discrete choice experiment

The purpose of this study was to elicit smoking couples' preferences for the 'format' and 'content' of couple-based interventions and partner support from both partners' perspectives, using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. An online DCE study was conducted during online interviews with 56 smoking couples (N = 112). Conditional logistic regression models were constructed to determine optimal profiles of couple-based treatment. Six attributes of couple-based smoking cessation interventions were identified as statistically significant: smokers and their partners preferred interventions that were designed for both partners, interactive, and tailored; they also valued positive support, open discussions with their partners, and having their partners involved in the quitting process. Smokers preferred to receive empathy, love, and trust from their partners rather than information, advice, and services. Income level and race interacted with the preferences for certain attributes. Differences in convenience, method of delivery, topics, duration, and frequency of treatment, willingness to provide support, frequency of partner support, and couple types were not significant. This study highlights the significance of incorporating partner involvement and support in smoking cessation interventions. The findings can provide direction for developing efficient couple-based interventions that consider the preferences of both smokers and partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Education Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences for couple-based smoking cessation interventions among couples who smoke: online discrete choice experiment

Seung Hee Choi, Diana Glenn, Thomas Templin
2 citations
Health Education Research
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
2.33
article

Preferences for couple-based smoking cessation interventions among couples who smoke: online discrete choice experiment

Seung Hee Choi, Diana Glenn, Thomas Templin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to elicit smoking couples' preferences for the 'format' and 'content' of couple-based interventions and partner support from both partners' perspectives, using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. An online DCE study was conducted during online interviews with 56 smoking couples (N = 112). Conditional logistic regression models were constructed to determine optimal profiles of couple-based treatment. Six attributes of couple-based smoking cessation interventions were identified as statistically significant: smokers and their partners preferred interventions that were designed for both partners, interactive, and tailored; they also valued positive support, open discussions with their partners, and having their partners involved in the quitting process. Smokers preferred to receive empathy, love, and trust from their partners rather than information, advice, and services. Income level and race interacted with the preferences for certain attributes. Differences in convenience, method of delivery, topics, duration, and frequency of treatment, willingness to provide support, frequency of partner support, and couple types were not significant. This study highlights the significance of incorporating partner involvement and support in smoking cessation interventions. The findings can provide direction for developing efficient couple-based interventions that consider the preferences of both smokers and partners.

Health Education ResearchVol. 40(3)
Wayne State University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.