Declaring racism a public health crisis

Since 2019, a growing number of local governments in the United States (US) have made declarations that racism is a public health crisis. These resolutions proliferated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The resolutions recognize the conjunctural nature of racism in the US and institute organizational changes and new policies but often fail to implement meaningful change in racial and health inequalities on the ground. Comparing the cases of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois and drawing on theories of biopower and stratified biomedicalization, this paper argues that these declarations instigate a shift in public health governance. Public health authority is expanded across multiple government domains, widening the scope of its jurisdiction and massifying the process of biomedicalization, combined with an economization of downstream programming by triaging resources via epidemiological metrics of vulnerability. Public health departments shift from providing services to becoming policy "strategists," which entails efforts to reduce organizational bias and a devolution of programming to communities. As a result, the biomedicalization of racism through these declarations enables an uneven and intermittent public health response that fails to attend to the lived experience of racism on the ground.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Declaring racism a public health crisis

Cal Lee Garrett, Claire Laurier Decoteau, Tirza Jo Ochrach-Konradi
1 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
2.82
article

Declaring racism a public health crisis

Cal Lee Garrett, Claire Laurier Decoteau, Tirza Jo Ochrach-Konradi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since 2019, a growing number of local governments in the United States (US) have made declarations that racism is a public health crisis. These resolutions proliferated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The resolutions recognize the conjunctural nature of racism in the US and institute organizational changes and new policies but often fail to implement meaningful change in racial and health inequalities on the ground. Comparing the cases of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois and drawing on theories of biopower and stratified biomedicalization, this paper argues that these declarations instigate a shift in public health governance. Public health authority is expanded across multiple government domains, widening the scope of its jurisdiction and massifying the process of biomedicalization, combined with an economization of downstream programming by triaging resources via epidemiological metrics of vulnerability. Public health departments shift from providing services to becoming policy "strategists," which entails efforts to reduce organizational bias and a devolution of programming to communities. As a result, the biomedicalization of racism through these declarations enables an uneven and intermittent public health response that fails to attend to the lived experience of racism on the ground.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 377
University of Illinois Chicago (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.