Global patterns and drivers of protected area system decentralization: A cross-national analysis

This study presents the first global analysis of decentralization patterns in national protected area systems (NPAS) across 118 countries. Using a hurdle regression model, we examine how country characteristics influence both the adoption and extent of NPAS decentralization. Our findings reveal that most NPAS remain largely centralized, with significant regional variations: the Americas show the highest rate of decentralization (31 %), while Europe shows the lowest (4 %). Conservation funding and public participation positively correlate with decentralization adoption. Among countries that have adopted decentralization policies, country size significantly increases the extent of decentralization, while protected area system age significantly constrains it. These findings provide insights for policymakers and conservation practitioners, suggesting that effective NPAS decentralization requires tailored approaches considering the local context, public engagement, and historical institutional development. • A global analysis shows that protected areas remain centralized across 118 countries. • The Americas lead (31 %), while Europe shows the lowest (7 %) decentralization rates. • Conservation funding and public participation enable decentralization adoption. • Country size increases the extent of decentralization. • Protected area system age constrains the extent of decentralization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100685
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global patterns and drivers of protected area system decentralization: A cross-national analysis

José Maria Cardoso da Silva, Liza Khmara, Michael Touchton
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Global patterns and drivers of protected area system decentralization: A cross-national analysis

José Maria Cardoso da Silva, Liza Khmara, Michael Touchton
article en

Abstract

This study presents the first global analysis of decentralization patterns in national protected area systems (NPAS) across 118 countries. Using a hurdle regression model, we examine how country characteristics influence both the adoption and extent of NPAS decentralization. Our findings reveal that most NPAS remain largely centralized, with significant regional variations: the Americas show the highest rate of decentralization (31 %), while Europe shows the lowest (4 %). Conservation funding and public participation positively correlate with decentralization adoption. Among countries that have adopted decentralization policies, country size significantly increases the extent of decentralization, while protected area system age significantly constrains it. These findings provide insights for policymakers and conservation practitioners, suggesting that effective NPAS decentralization requires tailored approaches considering the local context, public engagement, and historical institutional development. • A global analysis shows that protected areas remain centralized across 118 countries. • The Americas lead (31 %), while Europe shows the lowest (7 %) decentralization rates. • Conservation funding and public participation enable decentralization adoption. • Country size increases the extent of decentralization. • Protected area system age constrains the extent of decentralization.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 26
University of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.