Effect of Spinal Cord Compression and Deformation on Postoperative Neurological Deficits During Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Study DesignRetrospective comparative analysis.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the spinal cord deformation rate (SCDR) on postoperative neurological deficits (PNDs) in spinal deformity surgery and to determine the optimal SCDR threshold for risk stratification.MethodsPatients undergoing corrective surgery between October 2010 and March 2022 were included. Spinal cord morphology at the apex was assessed using axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, categorizing spinal cords into type-A and type-B. Differences between the two groups were analyzed and the odds ratio (OR) for PNDs in patients with type-B was calculated. For patients classified as type-B, univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables, including SCDR, that may influence PNDs risk. Statistically significant variables were further analyzed using multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of risk factors and determine the optimal cut-off value.ResultsAmong 200 patients included, PNDs occurred in 17 cases (8.5%), predominantly in type-B (15/82 in type-B vs 2/118 in type-A, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed SCDR as an independent predictor of PNDs (OR = 1.076, <i>P</i> = 0.001). ROC analysis determined an optimal SCDR cutoff of 42.15% (AUC: 0.867), with 82.4% sensitivity, 88.5% specificity, and 98.2% negative predictive value (NPV). SCDR demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to the major Cobb angle (AUC: 0.776) and T-DAR (AUC: 0.769).ConclusionsFor patients undergoing corrective surgery, an SCDR of ≥42.15% serves as a strong predictor of PNDs. Its high NPV effectively excludes low-risk patients, offering improved risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251336151
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Spinal Cord Compression and Deformation on Postoperative Neurological Deficits During Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Zhongqiang Chen, Yinhao Liu, Jiajun Ni, Lei Yuan et al.
Global Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Effect of Spinal Cord Compression and Deformation on Postoperative Neurological Deficits During Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Zhongqiang Chen, Yinhao Liu, Jiajun Ni, Lei Yuan, Yan Zeng, Jiaqi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective comparative analysis.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the spinal cord deformation rate (SCDR) on postoperative neurological deficits (PNDs) in spinal deformity surgery and to determine the optimal SCDR threshold for risk stratification.MethodsPatients undergoing corrective surgery between October 2010 and March 2022 were included. Spinal cord morphology at the apex was assessed using axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, categorizing spinal cords into type-A and type-B. Differences between the two groups were analyzed and the odds ratio (OR) for PNDs in patients with type-B was calculated. For patients classified as type-B, univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables, including SCDR, that may influence PNDs risk. Statistically significant variables were further analyzed using multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative ability of risk factors and determine the optimal cut-off value.ResultsAmong 200 patients included, PNDs occurred in 17 cases (8.5%), predominantly in type-B (15/82 in type-B vs 2/118 in type-A, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed SCDR as an independent predictor of PNDs (OR = 1.076, <i>P</i> = 0.001). ROC analysis determined an optimal SCDR cutoff of 42.15% (AUC: 0.867), with 82.4% sensitivity, 88.5% specificity, and 98.2% negative predictive value (NPV). SCDR demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to the major Cobb angle (AUC: 0.776) and T-DAR (AUC: 0.769).ConclusionsFor patients undergoing corrective surgery, an SCDR of ≥42.15% serves as a strong predictor of PNDs. Its high NPV effectively excludes low-risk patients, offering improved risk stratification.

Global Spine JournalVol. 16(1)
Peking University (CN), Spinal Research (GB), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.