Organizing refuge and domestic abuse services: a feminist oral history project

If freedom is understood as non-domination (Einspahr, 2010), then in the 1970s and 80s, Canterbury’s ‘Rising Sun’ domestic abuse refuge embodied the requisite collective agency and participatory processes. Where consciousness raising was understood as being inadequate to address women’s oppression, where working for or in the best interests of women rang hollow, genuine collaborative togetherness infused the social construction and rule making of the refuge. Drawing from interviews with the founders, volunteers and employees, this article’s methods build on scholarly interventions that aim to recover women’s lost history (Auchmuty and Rackley, 2016; Thompson, 2022), and its feminist empirical methodologies aim to resonate with that of the refuge community, understanding such work as a ‘continuous process of becoming’ (Whittingdale, 2021). The article traces the accomplishments of the refuge’s non-hierarchical ways of working, noting the method’s presented obstacles, while it expertly danced the fine line of the ‘tyranny of structurelessness’ (Freeman, 1972).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Gender and Justice
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/30333660y2025d000000011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Canadian Identity and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizing refuge and domestic abuse services: a feminist oral history project

Antonia Porter
1 citations
Gender and Justice
Canadian Identity and History
4.20
article

Organizing refuge and domestic abuse services: a feminist oral history project

Antonia Porter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

If freedom is understood as non-domination (Einspahr, 2010), then in the 1970s and 80s, Canterbury’s ‘Rising Sun’ domestic abuse refuge embodied the requisite collective agency and participatory processes. Where consciousness raising was understood as being inadequate to address women’s oppression, where working for or in the best interests of women rang hollow, genuine collaborative togetherness infused the social construction and rule making of the refuge. Drawing from interviews with the founders, volunteers and employees, this article’s methods build on scholarly interventions that aim to recover women’s lost history (Auchmuty and Rackley, 2016; Thompson, 2022), and its feminist empirical methodologies aim to resonate with that of the refuge community, understanding such work as a ‘continuous process of becoming’ (Whittingdale, 2021). The article traces the accomplishments of the refuge’s non-hierarchical ways of working, noting the method’s presented obstacles, while it expertly danced the fine line of the ‘tyranny of structurelessness’ (Freeman, 1972).

Gender and JusticeVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Canadian Identity and History
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.