Low Voltage Formation Process for Lithium Ion Battery Cells

Formation during production of lithium ion batteries requires a substantial investment of time and energy. The formation process traditionally consisted of one or a few charge/discharge cycles, allowing the formation of the interphase layers at anode and cathode. Here, two formation processes, one with 0.05 C and one with 1 C charge rate up to an upper cut-off voltage of 4.2 V, were compared with another formation process using a 0.05 C charge rate up to 3.1 V and 0.2 C up to 3.6 V. The electrolyte used in the LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 ||graphite-based 1 Ah wound-pouch cells contained ethoxy (pentafluoro) cyclotriphosphazene and fluoroethylene carbonate as additives. Higher charging currents resulted in reduced additive decomposition peaks in the d Q /d V vs capacity plot, which also resulted in reduced charge-transfer and SEI/CEI impedance. However, the two formation processes with an upper cut-off voltage of 4.2 V showed similar amounts of Li loss after the formation process and after 600 1 C cycles, while the 3.6 V formation displayed a 3.5% higher capacity retention at 1 C after 600 cycles, which could be related to a lower charge-transfer and SEI/CEI impedance. In addition, the 3.6 V formation process reduced the formation time to 2.3 h and the related energy consumption by >80%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/adce3a
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low Voltage Formation Process for Lithium Ion Battery Cells

Martin Winter, Philip Niehoff, Bastian Heidrich, Christian Clephas
2 citations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
article

Low Voltage Formation Process for Lithium Ion Battery Cells

Martin Winter, Philip Niehoff, Bastian Heidrich, Christian Clephas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Formation during production of lithium ion batteries requires a substantial investment of time and energy. The formation process traditionally consisted of one or a few charge/discharge cycles, allowing the formation of the interphase layers at anode and cathode. Here, two formation processes, one with 0.05 C and one with 1 C charge rate up to an upper cut-off voltage of 4.2 V, were compared with another formation process using a 0.05 C charge rate up to 3.1 V and 0.2 C up to 3.6 V. The electrolyte used in the LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 ||graphite-based 1 Ah wound-pouch cells contained ethoxy (pentafluoro) cyclotriphosphazene and fluoroethylene carbonate as additives. Higher charging currents resulted in reduced additive decomposition peaks in the d Q /d V vs capacity plot, which also resulted in reduced charge-transfer and SEI/CEI impedance. However, the two formation processes with an upper cut-off voltage of 4.2 V showed similar amounts of Li loss after the formation process and after 600 1 C cycles, while the 3.6 V formation displayed a 3.5% higher capacity retention at 1 C after 600 cycles, which could be related to a lower charge-transfer and SEI/CEI impedance. In addition, the 3.6 V formation process reduced the formation time to 2.3 h and the related energy consumption by >80%.

Journal of The Electrochemical SocietyVol. 172(5)
University of Münster (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.