Visualizing functional network connectivity differences using an explainable machine-learning method

<i>Objective</i>. Functional network connectivity (FNC) estimated from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging showed great information about the neural mechanism in different brain disorders. But previous research has mainly focused on standard statistical learning approaches to find FNC features separating patients from control. While machine learning models can improve classification accuracy, they often lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their decisions.<i>Approach</i>. Explainable machine learning helps address this issue by identifying which features contribute most to the model's predictions. In this study, we introduce a novel framework leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) to identify crucial FNC features distinguishing between two distinct population classes.<i>Main results</i>. Initially, we validate our approach using synthetic data. Subsequently, applying our framework, we ascertain FNC biomarkers distinguishing between, controls and schizophrenia (SZ) patients with accuracy of 81.04% as well as middle aged adults and old aged adults with accuracy 71.38%, respectively, employing random forest, XGBoost, and CATBoost models.<i>Significance</i>. Our analysis underscores the pivotal role of the cognitive control network (CCN), subcortical network (SCN), and somatomotor network in discerning individuals with SZ from controls. In addition, our platform found CCN and SCN as the most important networks separating young adults from older.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Measurement
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adce52
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualizing functional network connectivity differences using an explainable machine-learning method

Judith M. Ford, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Daniel H. Mathalon, Mohammad S.E. Sendi et al.
1 citations
Physiological Measurement
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
1.43
article

Visualizing functional network connectivity differences using an explainable machine-learning method

Judith M. Ford, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Daniel H. Mathalon, Mohammad S.E. Sendi, Adrian Preda, Ji Ye Chun, Theo G.M. van Erp, Vaibhavi S. Itkyal, Vince Calhoun, Jessica Turner, Sabrina Edwards-Stewart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. Functional network connectivity (FNC) estimated from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging showed great information about the neural mechanism in different brain disorders. But previous research has mainly focused on standard statistical learning approaches to find FNC features separating patients from control. While machine learning models can improve classification accuracy, they often lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their decisions.<i>Approach</i>. Explainable machine learning helps address this issue by identifying which features contribute most to the model's predictions. In this study, we introduce a novel framework leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) to identify crucial FNC features distinguishing between two distinct population classes.<i>Main results</i>. Initially, we validate our approach using synthetic data. Subsequently, applying our framework, we ascertain FNC biomarkers distinguishing between, controls and schizophrenia (SZ) patients with accuracy of 81.04% as well as middle aged adults and old aged adults with accuracy 71.38%, respectively, employing random forest, XGBoost, and CATBoost models.<i>Significance</i>. Our analysis underscores the pivotal role of the cognitive control network (CCN), subcortical network (SCN), and somatomotor network in discerning individuals with SZ from controls. In addition, our platform found CCN and SCN as the most important networks separating young adults from older.

Physiological MeasurementVol. 46(4)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Georgia State University (US), Chapman University (US), Neurosciences Institute (US), University of California, Irvine (US), McLean Hospital (US), The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering (US), Yale University (US), Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (US), Institute for Behavioral Medicine (US), Irvine University (US), San Francisco VA Health Care System (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing, National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.