Investigating bicycle crash frequency, severity, and safety in numbers at signalized intersections in Utah using crowdsourced data

This study’s objectives were to (1) understand (geometric, traffic, operational, and other) factors associated with bicycle safety (crash frequency and severity) at signalized intersections; and (2) investigate whether the “safety in numbers” phenomenon applies to bicycling in the US. To accomplish these objectives, data for 2312 bicycle crashes over a ten-year (2010–2019) period were linked to crowdsourced Strava ridership data (as a measure of bicycle exposure) and other information at 2232 signalized intersections in Utah. Zero-inflated negative binomial models of bicycle crash frequencies and ordered logit models of bicycle crash severities were estimated, accounting for different levels of data availability. Also, an aggregate time period analysis compared bicycle crash rates and severity levels for different weekdays and months. Bicycle crashes were more frequent at signals with four legs, longer crossing distances, no channelized right turn lanes, more far-side bus stops, higher population densities, no places of worship, and in neighborhoods with lower incomes and greater shares of people of Hispanic or non-White race/ethnicity. Bicycle crashes were more severe when involving larger or left-turning vehicles, road users who disregarded the traffic control device, on arterial roadways, and at locations with vertical grades and without street lighting. Bicycle crash rates and the share of fatal/serious injury crashes were lower during the highest-ridership months of the year (May–August). Overall, the study found strong support for the “safety in numbers” effect, in which bicycle crash rates decrease with increasing bicycle volumes, when looking both across locations and over time. • Negative binomial and ordered logit models of bicycle crash frequency and severity. • Strong evidence of a “safety in numbers” effect for bicycle crashes. • Signals with longer crossing distances saw slightly more bicycle crashes. • Vehicle size and maneuvering direction affected bicycle crash severity. • Bicycle crash rates were lower during high-ridership months of the year.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100068
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating bicycle crash frequency, severity, and safety in numbers at signalized intersections in Utah using crowdsourced data

Michelle Mekker, Patrick A. Singleton, Ahadul Islam
1 citations
Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research
Traffic and Road Safety
1.30
article

Investigating bicycle crash frequency, severity, and safety in numbers at signalized intersections in Utah using crowdsourced data

Michelle Mekker, Patrick A. Singleton, Ahadul Islam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study’s objectives were to (1) understand (geometric, traffic, operational, and other) factors associated with bicycle safety (crash frequency and severity) at signalized intersections; and (2) investigate whether the “safety in numbers” phenomenon applies to bicycling in the US. To accomplish these objectives, data for 2312 bicycle crashes over a ten-year (2010–2019) period were linked to crowdsourced Strava ridership data (as a measure of bicycle exposure) and other information at 2232 signalized intersections in Utah. Zero-inflated negative binomial models of bicycle crash frequencies and ordered logit models of bicycle crash severities were estimated, accounting for different levels of data availability. Also, an aggregate time period analysis compared bicycle crash rates and severity levels for different weekdays and months. Bicycle crashes were more frequent at signals with four legs, longer crossing distances, no channelized right turn lanes, more far-side bus stops, higher population densities, no places of worship, and in neighborhoods with lower incomes and greater shares of people of Hispanic or non-White race/ethnicity. Bicycle crashes were more severe when involving larger or left-turning vehicles, road users who disregarded the traffic control device, on arterial roadways, and at locations with vertical grades and without street lighting. Bicycle crash rates and the share of fatal/serious injury crashes were lower during the highest-ridership months of the year (May–August). Overall, the study found strong support for the “safety in numbers” effect, in which bicycle crash rates decrease with increasing bicycle volumes, when looking both across locations and over time. • Negative binomial and ordered logit models of bicycle crash frequency and severity. • Strong evidence of a “safety in numbers” effect for bicycle crashes. • Signals with longer crossing distances saw slightly more bicycle crashes. • Vehicle size and maneuvering direction affected bicycle crash severity. • Bicycle crash rates were lower during high-ridership months of the year.

Journal of Cycling and Micromobility ResearchVol. 4
Utah State University (US)
Utah Department of Transportation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Traffic and Road Safety
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.