Busy Urban Soundscape Underwater: Acoustic Indicators vs. Hydrophone Data

Urban noise pollution extends into aquatic environments, influencing underwater ecosystems. This study examines the effectiveness of acoustic indicators in characterizing urban underwater soundscapes using hydrophone recordings. Three indices, the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), Acoustic Diversity Index (ADI), and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI), were analyzed to assess their ability to distinguish anthropogenic and natural acoustic sources. The results indicate that the ACI tracks urban noise fluctuations, particularly from vehicles and trams, while the ADI primarily reflects transient environmental interferences. The NDSI, while designed to differentiate biophony from anthropogenic noise, proves unreliable in urban underwater settings, often misclassifying noise sources. These findings highlight the limitations of traditional acoustic indices in urban aquatic environments and emphasize the need for refined methods to improve hydrophone data interpretation. Thus, this study aims to understand the acoustic indicators’ interactions with underwater urban noise, which is crucial for enhancing environmental monitoring and noise mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9040129
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Busy Urban Soundscape Underwater: Acoustic Indicators vs. Hydrophone Data

Rengin Aslanoğlu, Grzegorz Chrobak, Jan K. Kazak, J. B. Wilkerson et al.
Urban Science
Marine animal studies overview
article

Busy Urban Soundscape Underwater: Acoustic Indicators vs. Hydrophone Data

Rengin Aslanoğlu, Grzegorz Chrobak, Jan K. Kazak, J. B. Wilkerson, Kamil Monastyrski
article en

Abstract

Urban noise pollution extends into aquatic environments, influencing underwater ecosystems. This study examines the effectiveness of acoustic indicators in characterizing urban underwater soundscapes using hydrophone recordings. Three indices, the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), Acoustic Diversity Index (ADI), and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI), were analyzed to assess their ability to distinguish anthropogenic and natural acoustic sources. The results indicate that the ACI tracks urban noise fluctuations, particularly from vehicles and trams, while the ADI primarily reflects transient environmental interferences. The NDSI, while designed to differentiate biophony from anthropogenic noise, proves unreliable in urban underwater settings, often misclassifying noise sources. These findings highlight the limitations of traditional acoustic indices in urban aquatic environments and emphasize the need for refined methods to improve hydrophone data interpretation. Thus, this study aims to understand the acoustic indicators’ interactions with underwater urban noise, which is crucial for enhancing environmental monitoring and noise mitigation strategies.

Urban ScienceVol. 9(4)
University of Wrocław (PL), Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL), The Hague University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Busy Urban Soundscape Underwater: Acoustic Indicators vs. Hydrophone Data — Rengin Aslanoğlu, Grzegorz Chrobak, et al. · Urban Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS