The Concept of Discourse: Features and Interpretation

The concept of discourse occupies a central position in contemporary linguistic studies, reflecting the anthropocentric orientation of language. Discourse is widely regarded as a complex communicative process that integrates both linguistic and extralinguistic dimensions. Furthermore, numerous scholars emphasize its multifaceted nature, encompassing cognitive, sociocultural, and pragmatic aspects. This article aims to explore the theoretical foundations of discourse and its classification into various types, such as personal and institutional discourse. In addition, a comparative analysis of English and Russian lexicographic traditions highlights significant differences. While both languages underscore the importance of communicative interaction, the Russian perspective uniquely incorporates extralinguistic factors, including sociocultural and psychological dimensions. Consequently, discourse is conceptualized as a bridge between reality and text, facilitating a nuanced understanding of language use. Moreover, advertising discourse is identified as a subset of media discourse, distinguished by its systemic features. Ultimately, the study advances theoretical insights into discourse’s situational relevance and practical implications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/113/69
Primary Topic
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Discourse: Features and Interpretation

Ch. Abdullaeva
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
article

The Concept of Discourse: Features and Interpretation

Ch. Abdullaeva
article en

Abstract

The concept of discourse occupies a central position in contemporary linguistic studies, reflecting the anthropocentric orientation of language. Discourse is widely regarded as a complex communicative process that integrates both linguistic and extralinguistic dimensions. Furthermore, numerous scholars emphasize its multifaceted nature, encompassing cognitive, sociocultural, and pragmatic aspects. This article aims to explore the theoretical foundations of discourse and its classification into various types, such as personal and institutional discourse. In addition, a comparative analysis of English and Russian lexicographic traditions highlights significant differences. While both languages underscore the importance of communicative interaction, the Russian perspective uniquely incorporates extralinguistic factors, including sociocultural and psychological dimensions. Consequently, discourse is conceptualized as a bridge between reality and text, facilitating a nuanced understanding of language use. Moreover, advertising discourse is identified as a subset of media discourse, distinguished by its systemic features. Ultimately, the study advances theoretical insights into discourse’s situational relevance and practical implications.

Bulletin of Science and PracticeVol. 11(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.