A New Preclinical Surgical Model for the Assessment of Dental Implant Tissue Integration

Background/Objectives: The structural integrity and strength of the transgingival soft tissue seal around dental implant surfaces remain critical challenges. Therefore, animal models should include all three implant/tissue interfaces: bone, connective tissue, and epithelium. Thus, we sought to explore the rabbit mandibular diastema as a site for candidate intra-oral implant placement. Methods: Ninety-six custom mini-implants (with one of four different surfaces: machined, acid-etched, and with or without a nanotube coating) made from titanium 6/4 alloy were placed in the mandibular diastemas of twenty-four 16-week-old New Zealand white rabbits, with the implant collar above the alveolar crest. After 7, 21, and 42 days, the bony and connective tissue/implant interfaces were examined by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Of ninety-six implants, eight implants were found exposed to the oral cavity, with no evidence of soft tissue inflammation, suggesting that transmucosal implant placement would have been feasible. No significant differences were observed in collagen fiber orientation and fibrous tissue thickness by polarized light microscopy. However, SEM images showed that at all three time points, topographically complex nanotube surfaces had a profound effect on soft tissue peri-implant deposition, although functionally oriented collagen fibers were not identified attached to the implant surface. These surfaces also showed reparative peri-implant bone in the collar region. An intramembranous form of de novo bone formation was observed, together with tartrate-resistant acid-phosphatase-positive osteoclasts and multinucleate giant cells in the peri-implant endosseous compartment. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the rabbit mandibular diastema provides an intra-oral method of implant placement without the necessity of an extra-oral approach, tooth extractions, or bone augmentation procedures. Furthermore, given that three implant tissue interfaces can potentially be studied (bone, connective tissue, and epithelium) this model provides advantages over more traditional implant placement sites in the appendicular skeleton.