Death Penalty For Drug Traffickers: A Legal and Human Rights Perspective

The increase in drug abuse cases in Indonesia has placed the death penalty for dealers as one of the instruments of criminal law policy. Although the death penalty aims to provide a deterrent effect and justice, this policy has drawn criticism because it is considered contrary to the principles of human rights (HAM) and has the potential to create disparities in its application. This research analyses the application of the death penalty from the perspective of absolute, relative, and combined punishment theories, as well as evaluating its effectiveness in handling narcotics cases. The results show that the application of the death penalty needs to be reconsidered, especially for non-violent offenders, by prioritising rehabilitation and prevention approaches. A combination of legal and rehabilitation strategies is needed to minimise the use of the death penalty, accompanied by continuous monitoring and evaluation to ensure transparency and accountability in law enforcement. This research recommends more sustainable policy alternatives, in line with human rights values and social justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Evidence Of Law
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.938
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Death Penalty For Drug Traffickers: A Legal and Human Rights Perspective

Kristiawanto Kristiawanto, Supono Supono, Tubagus Achmad Darodjat
Journal Evidence Of Law
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Death Penalty For Drug Traffickers: A Legal and Human Rights Perspective

Kristiawanto Kristiawanto, Supono Supono, Tubagus Achmad Darodjat
article en

Abstract

The increase in drug abuse cases in Indonesia has placed the death penalty for dealers as one of the instruments of criminal law policy. Although the death penalty aims to provide a deterrent effect and justice, this policy has drawn criticism because it is considered contrary to the principles of human rights (HAM) and has the potential to create disparities in its application. This research analyses the application of the death penalty from the perspective of absolute, relative, and combined punishment theories, as well as evaluating its effectiveness in handling narcotics cases. The results show that the application of the death penalty needs to be reconsidered, especially for non-violent offenders, by prioritising rehabilitation and prevention approaches. A combination of legal and rehabilitation strategies is needed to minimise the use of the death penalty, accompanied by continuous monitoring and evaluation to ensure transparency and accountability in law enforcement. This research recommends more sustainable policy alternatives, in line with human rights values and social justice.

Journal Evidence Of LawVol. 3(3)
Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep (TH), Universitas Jayabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.