Juridical Review of Alternative Business Dispute Resolution as a Form of Consumer Rights Protection

The settlement of business disputes between consumers and business actors is an increasingly crucial issue along with the increasing complexity of transactions in the digital era and global economy. The purpose of this research is to analyze the role of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) in supporting alternative business dispute resolution as an effort to protect consumer rights in Indonesia and analyze the effectiveness of alternative business dispute resolution in protecting consumer rights in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative juridical research. The results showed that BPSK plays an important role in providing more effective alternative dispute resolution for Indonesian consumers through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration mechanisms that are friendly, fast, and affordable. Through this approach, BPSK supports the protection of consumer rights and encourages fair and responsible business practices among business actors. The effectiveness of alternative business dispute resolution also creates flexible and efficient solutions, addressing consumer justice needs in a cheaper and faster way. Despite some challenges, ADR provides a favorable solution for consumers and businesses in resolving business disputes..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Evidence Of Law
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.941
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juridical Review of Alternative Business Dispute Resolution as a Form of Consumer Rights Protection

Muhammad Hidayat Sumarna, Supot Rattanapun, O. Djunaedi
Journal Evidence Of Law
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Juridical Review of Alternative Business Dispute Resolution as a Form of Consumer Rights Protection

Muhammad Hidayat Sumarna, Supot Rattanapun, O. Djunaedi
article en

Abstract

The settlement of business disputes between consumers and business actors is an increasingly crucial issue along with the increasing complexity of transactions in the digital era and global economy. The purpose of this research is to analyze the role of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) in supporting alternative business dispute resolution as an effort to protect consumer rights in Indonesia and analyze the effectiveness of alternative business dispute resolution in protecting consumer rights in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative juridical research. The results showed that BPSK plays an important role in providing more effective alternative dispute resolution for Indonesian consumers through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration mechanisms that are friendly, fast, and affordable. Through this approach, BPSK supports the protection of consumer rights and encourages fair and responsible business practices among business actors. The effectiveness of alternative business dispute resolution also creates flexible and efficient solutions, addressing consumer justice needs in a cheaper and faster way. Despite some challenges, ADR provides a favorable solution for consumers and businesses in resolving business disputes..

Journal Evidence Of LawVol. 3(3)
Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep (TH), Universitas Jayabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Juridical Review of Alternative Business Dispute Resolution as a Form of Consumer Rights Protection — Muhammad Hidayat Sumarna, Supot Rattanapun, et al. · Journal Evidence Of Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS