A Survey-Based Quantification of Imposter Phenomenon In Occupational Therapy

Background: Imposter phenomenon is a professional issue that negatively affects health professionals’ performance and well-being. This study examined imposter phenomenon’s prevalence in occupational therapy (OT). Researchers hypothesized that imposter phenomenon is prevalent in OT, more so in underrepresented groups. The rate of imposter phenomenon throughout OT was quantified and rates between demographic groups compared. Method: This study used an exploratory, survey-based research design. Survey sections included informed consent, demographics, and the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). The CIPS measured rates of imposterism. Analyses of variances and independent group t-tests were performed to identify significant differences between groups. Inclusion criteria was occupational therapists and students, worldwide; recruitment via convenience sample and snowball methodology; incomplete responses excluded. Results: Results included 655 responses (N = 655). The mean whole score of respondents was 55.87, with 83.97% of participants reporting, at minimum, moderate imposter experiences. Significant differences were found between demographic groups based on role, disability, ethnicity, degree, age, and years of experience. No significant differences were found between practice settings, genders, or AOTA membership. Conclusion: Imposter phenomenon is prevalent throughout OT, with notable differences between demographic groups. This study points to the importance of mitigating imposter phenomenon throughout educational and professional contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.2344
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey-Based Quantification of Imposter Phenomenon In Occupational Therapy

S. Walsh, Dina Prisco
1 citations
The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
2.31
article

A Survey-Based Quantification of Imposter Phenomenon In Occupational Therapy

S. Walsh, Dina Prisco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Imposter phenomenon is a professional issue that negatively affects health professionals’ performance and well-being. This study examined imposter phenomenon’s prevalence in occupational therapy (OT). Researchers hypothesized that imposter phenomenon is prevalent in OT, more so in underrepresented groups. The rate of imposter phenomenon throughout OT was quantified and rates between demographic groups compared. Method: This study used an exploratory, survey-based research design. Survey sections included informed consent, demographics, and the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). The CIPS measured rates of imposterism. Analyses of variances and independent group t-tests were performed to identify significant differences between groups. Inclusion criteria was occupational therapists and students, worldwide; recruitment via convenience sample and snowball methodology; incomplete responses excluded. Results: Results included 655 responses (N = 655). The mean whole score of respondents was 55.87, with 83.97% of participants reporting, at minimum, moderate imposter experiences. Significant differences were found between demographic groups based on role, disability, ethnicity, degree, age, and years of experience. No significant differences were found between practice settings, genders, or AOTA membership. Conclusion: Imposter phenomenon is prevalent throughout OT, with notable differences between demographic groups. This study points to the importance of mitigating imposter phenomenon throughout educational and professional contexts.

The Open Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 13(2)
Wagner College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.