Ética Científica Global: Revisión Sistemática y Comparativa de Códigos Internacionales

In the present research, a systematic review was carried out, with the objective of systematizing the empirical evidence on the implications of the different international codes of ethics on research practice and showing the impact on scientific practice of the different codes such as the Nuremberg Code, Helsinki Standards, among others. Based on the PRISMA method, the Scielo, WoS and Scopus databases were used, where primary articles in Spanish and English from the last 5 years were selected. As a result, 309 articles were found, and 10 articles relevant to the topic were included. Among the main results on the implications for scientific practice, it stands out that it improves interdisciplinary collaboration, there is greater rigor in the research methodology, protection of participants, use of informed consent, favors the integrity of the researcher, professional self-regulation, and improves confidence. In conclusion, codes of ethics not only regulate individual practices, but establish the basis for reliable and responsible science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UCV - SCIENTIA
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18050/revucv-scientia.v16n2a4
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ética Científica Global: Revisión Sistemática y Comparativa de Códigos Internacionales

Walter Társilio Pilar Bueno, Doris Martínez Mendívil, Nicandro Rios Julca
UCV - SCIENTIA
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

Ética Científica Global: Revisión Sistemática y Comparativa de Códigos Internacionales

Walter Társilio Pilar Bueno, Doris Martínez Mendívil, Nicandro Rios Julca
article en

Abstract

In the present research, a systematic review was carried out, with the objective of systematizing the empirical evidence on the implications of the different international codes of ethics on research practice and showing the impact on scientific practice of the different codes such as the Nuremberg Code, Helsinki Standards, among others. Based on the PRISMA method, the Scielo, WoS and Scopus databases were used, where primary articles in Spanish and English from the last 5 years were selected. As a result, 309 articles were found, and 10 articles relevant to the topic were included. Among the main results on the implications for scientific practice, it stands out that it improves interdisciplinary collaboration, there is greater rigor in the research methodology, protection of participants, use of informed consent, favors the integrity of the researcher, professional self-regulation, and improves confidence. In conclusion, codes of ethics not only regulate individual practices, but establish the basis for reliable and responsible science.

UCV - SCIENTIAVol. 16(2)
Universidad César Vallejo (PE), Universidad Continental (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.