Constructive Mutualism: The Future of Teaching and Learning

Constructive Mutualism: The future of teaching and learning For fifty years the education sector has been trying to break away from the Behaviourist paradigm, where responsibility for classroom management and enforcement of rules relies solely with the teacher [1].This traditional classroom management technique, when in full force delivered high levels of student engagement albeit with poor quality of attention.As the learning required at the time was largely rote, other forms of memorisation and procedural repetition this was not a major failing.Gradually, the use of reward and punishment, the basis for this paradigm, has weakened, especially, the punishment side which has led to a drop in the time and quality of attention which is achievable from students via these means and a subsequent increase in disruptions evidenced in many Australian schools.This has now reached crisis proportions."In Australia, many students are consistently disengaged in class: as many as 40 per cent are unproductive in a given year.The main problem is not aggressive and anti-social behaviour.More prevalent and stressful for teachers are minor disruptions, such as students talking back.Nor is it just about noise: nearly one in four students are compliant but quietly disengaged.We do not know exactly what causes students in Australia to disengage" [2].

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61440/jcrcs.2025.v3.65
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructive Mutualism: The Future of Teaching and Learning

John D. Corrigan, Mark Merry
Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Constructive Mutualism: The Future of Teaching and Learning

John D. Corrigan, Mark Merry
article en

Abstract

Constructive Mutualism: The future of teaching and learning For fifty years the education sector has been trying to break away from the Behaviourist paradigm, where responsibility for classroom management and enforcement of rules relies solely with the teacher [1].This traditional classroom management technique, when in full force delivered high levels of student engagement albeit with poor quality of attention.As the learning required at the time was largely rote, other forms of memorisation and procedural repetition this was not a major failing.Gradually, the use of reward and punishment, the basis for this paradigm, has weakened, especially, the punishment side which has led to a drop in the time and quality of attention which is achievable from students via these means and a subsequent increase in disruptions evidenced in many Australian schools.This has now reached crisis proportions."In Australia, many students are consistently disengaged in class: as many as 40 per cent are unproductive in a given year.The main problem is not aggressive and anti-social behaviour.More prevalent and stressful for teachers are minor disruptions, such as students talking back.Nor is it just about noise: nearly one in four students are compliant but quietly disengaged.We do not know exactly what causes students in Australia to disengage" [2].

Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.