Abstract P1044: External validation of a novel cancer-associated venous thromboembolism risk assessment score in a safety-net hospital

Background: Cancer-associated VTE (CAT) is the second leading cause of death in patients diagnosed with cancer. However, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis use in cancer patients must be tightly regulated due to a two-fold increased risk of experiencing a major bleeding event within this population. A cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) risk assessment model (RAM) has recently been developed utilizing patient electronic health records (EHR) that reports improved performance over the prior state-of-the-art Khorana score. Objective: To externally validate a recently published RAM using EHR data from 2,103 cancer patients at Boston Medical Center, New England’s largest safety-net hospital, and to compare this RAM to the Khorana score. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of Boston Medical Center (BMC) cancer patients diagnosed between January 2014 and December 2022 using data from the BMC tumor registry and electronic health record system. We validated the risk assessment model using measures of discrimination and calibration. Results: The recently published score exhibited a strong ability to discriminate risk of CAT (C statistic, 0.67) substantially higher than the classic Khorana score (C statistic, 0.58). This increased discrimination power reflects the 20% of patients correctly reclassified into high or low risk by the expanded score. Model calibration was also strong in this dataset. Conclusion: In our external validation, the recently published CAT score clearly and improvedly separated patients at high and low risk for CAT. This expanded CAT score could facilitate improved selection of prophylactic therapy among cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p1044
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P1044: External validation of a novel cancer-associated venous thromboembolism risk assessment score in a safety-net hospital

J. Michael Gaziano, Vipul C. Chitalia, Katya Ravid, Nhan Do et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract P1044: External validation of a novel cancer-associated venous thromboembolism risk assessment score in a safety-net hospital

J. Michael Gaziano, Vipul C. Chitalia, Katya Ravid, Nhan Do, Karlynn E. Neu, Jennifer La, Nathanael R. Fillmore, Mary T. Brophy, Saran Lotfollahzadeh, Ang Li
article en

Abstract

Background: Cancer-associated VTE (CAT) is the second leading cause of death in patients diagnosed with cancer. However, pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis use in cancer patients must be tightly regulated due to a two-fold increased risk of experiencing a major bleeding event within this population. A cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) risk assessment model (RAM) has recently been developed utilizing patient electronic health records (EHR) that reports improved performance over the prior state-of-the-art Khorana score. Objective: To externally validate a recently published RAM using EHR data from 2,103 cancer patients at Boston Medical Center, New England’s largest safety-net hospital, and to compare this RAM to the Khorana score. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of Boston Medical Center (BMC) cancer patients diagnosed between January 2014 and December 2022 using data from the BMC tumor registry and electronic health record system. We validated the risk assessment model using measures of discrimination and calibration. Results: The recently published score exhibited a strong ability to discriminate risk of CAT (C statistic, 0.67) substantially higher than the classic Khorana score (C statistic, 0.58). This increased discrimination power reflects the 20% of patients correctly reclassified into high or low risk by the expanded score. Model calibration was also strong in this dataset. Conclusion: In our external validation, the recently published CAT score clearly and improvedly separated patients at high and low risk for CAT. This expanded CAT score could facilitate improved selection of prophylactic therapy among cancer patients.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Boston University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.