Abstract MP35: Community Prevalence of the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome: The Dallas Heart Study

Introduction: The recent AHA presidential advisory on Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (CKM) proposed a novel staging scheme, but limited data exist regarding CKM stage prevalence in the community. Prior population-based studies have lacked subclinical imaging measures, and have not reported variability by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Methods: We estimated the population prevalence of CKM stages in Dallas County, from among 2,817 participants in the population-sampled Dallas Heart Study who attended study Visit 1 (2000-2002). Participants underwent protocol measurement of body composition, lipids, fasting blood sugar, serum creatinine, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, urinary albumin and creatinine, coronary artery calcium by cardiac CT (CAC), and cardiac function and mass by cardiac MRI. These were used to operationalize the following CKM stages: 0 – no CKM risk factors; 1 – excess or dysfunctional adiposity (body mass index, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose); 2 – metabolic risk factors (hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome) and chronic kidney disease; 3 – subclinical cardiovascular diseases (CAC, LV hypertrophy or dysfunction by cardiac MRI, elevated cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or hs-cTnT), high AHA-PREVENT or KDIGO scores); 4 – prevalent cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke). We used sampling weights to estimate the prevalence of CKM stages in Dallas County in 2000-2002 overall and by age category (30-44, 45-59, 60-65 years), gender, and race/ethnicity. Results: Among the 2,817 participants with a mean age of 44±10 years, the sample weighted demographics were 50% women, 52% non-Hispanic White, 20% non-Hispanic Black, and 26% Hispanic race/ethnicity. Among Dallas County adults, only 10% were CKM Stage 0 (no risk factors). The weighted prevalence of CKM Stages 1 through 4 was 16%, 46%, 23%, and 5%, respectively ( Figure A) . CKM stage prevalence was similar between men and women, while CKM Stage 4 was more frequent among older individuals and among non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White and Hispanic individuals ( Figure B ). Conclusion: The public health burden of CKM is substantial. Ninety percent of Dallas County residents in 2000-2002 had some form of CKM syndrome, nearly half demonstrated metabolic dysfunction (Stage 2), and nearly one-fourth had subclinical cardiovascular disease (Stage 3).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.mp35
Primary Topic
Neurological and metabolic disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract MP35: Community Prevalence of the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome: The Dallas Heart Study

Colby Ayers, Amit Khera, Parag H. Joshi, Amil M. Shah et al.
Circulation
Neurological and metabolic disorders
article

Abstract MP35: Community Prevalence of the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome: The Dallas Heart Study

Colby Ayers, Amit Khera, Parag H. Joshi, Amil M. Shah, James A. de Lemos, Khaled Shelbaya, Ian J. Neeland, Anand K. Rohatgi, Victoria Lamberson, Yimin Yang, Yinun Zeleke
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The recent AHA presidential advisory on Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (CKM) proposed a novel staging scheme, but limited data exist regarding CKM stage prevalence in the community. Prior population-based studies have lacked subclinical imaging measures, and have not reported variability by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Methods: We estimated the population prevalence of CKM stages in Dallas County, from among 2,817 participants in the population-sampled Dallas Heart Study who attended study Visit 1 (2000-2002). Participants underwent protocol measurement of body composition, lipids, fasting blood sugar, serum creatinine, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, urinary albumin and creatinine, coronary artery calcium by cardiac CT (CAC), and cardiac function and mass by cardiac MRI. These were used to operationalize the following CKM stages: 0 – no CKM risk factors; 1 – excess or dysfunctional adiposity (body mass index, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose); 2 – metabolic risk factors (hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome) and chronic kidney disease; 3 – subclinical cardiovascular diseases (CAC, LV hypertrophy or dysfunction by cardiac MRI, elevated cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or hs-cTnT), high AHA-PREVENT or KDIGO scores); 4 – prevalent cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke). We used sampling weights to estimate the prevalence of CKM stages in Dallas County in 2000-2002 overall and by age category (30-44, 45-59, 60-65 years), gender, and race/ethnicity. Results: Among the 2,817 participants with a mean age of 44±10 years, the sample weighted demographics were 50% women, 52% non-Hispanic White, 20% non-Hispanic Black, and 26% Hispanic race/ethnicity. Among Dallas County adults, only 10% were CKM Stage 0 (no risk factors). The weighted prevalence of CKM Stages 1 through 4 was 16%, 46%, 23%, and 5%, respectively ( Figure A) . CKM stage prevalence was similar between men and women, while CKM Stage 4 was more frequent among older individuals and among non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White and Hispanic individuals ( Figure B ). Conclusion: The public health burden of CKM is substantial. Ninety percent of Dallas County residents in 2000-2002 had some form of CKM syndrome, nearly half demonstrated metabolic dysfunction (Stage 2), and nearly one-fourth had subclinical cardiovascular disease (Stage 3).

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Neurological and metabolic disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.