Abstract MP44: Plasma Proteomic Signature Of BMI Reveals Heterogeneous Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles Within And Across Standard BMI Classifications

Background: The proteome is altered in obesity and proteomic signatures of BMI have been identified. However, few studies have examined differences in clinical profiles between actual and protein-predicted BMI. Hypothesis: Plasma protein-based BMI classification will better capture cardiometabolic risk compared to actual BMI classification. Methods: Data on cardiometabolic phenotypes and plasma proteins (4979 proteins via SomaScan) were available in 645 adults (56% Female, 35% Black, 17-65 yrs) from the HERITAGE Family Study. LASSO regression models with 10-fold-cross-validation were used to create a BMI proteomic signature. Protein-predicted BMI was classified into weight classes and compared to actual BMI classification to create 7 groups (underpredicted, matched, or overpredicted) ( Fig 1A ). General linear models adjusted for age, sex, race, and measured BMI were used to examine differences in cardiometabolic traits across groups. Results: The LASSO model (R 2 =0.82, RMSE=2.2) included 208 proteins. Protein-predicted BMI correlated with actual BMI at r=0.95 (p<0.0001), with a 16% misclassification rate ( Fig 1A ). Participants whose proteins underpredicted BMI class generally had more favorable cardiometabolic profiles than matched groups of the same class, while overpredicted BMI class groups showed worse cardiometabolic profiles than matched groups of the same class ( Fig 1B ). Conclusions: We identified individuals matched for BMI but with opposing proteomic signatures that differed in cardiometabolic risk profiles. Proteomic profiling may identify clinically meaningful heterogeneity in cardiometabolic health not fully captured by BMI that could potentially be used as biomarkers and/or targets of therapeutic responsiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.mp44
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract MP44: Plasma Proteomic Signature Of BMI Reveals Heterogeneous Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles Within And Across Standard BMI Classifications

Jeremy Robbins, Jacob L. Barber, Eric C. Leszczynski, Matthew Herzig et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract MP44: Plasma Proteomic Signature Of BMI Reveals Heterogeneous Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles Within And Across Standard BMI Classifications

Jeremy Robbins, Jacob L. Barber, Eric C. Leszczynski, Matthew Herzig, Clary B. Clish, Mark A. Sarzynski, Claude Bouchard, Prasun K Dev, Michael Mi, Prashant Rao, Sujoy Ghosh, Kevin B. Jacobs, Robert Gerszten
article en

Abstract

Background: The proteome is altered in obesity and proteomic signatures of BMI have been identified. However, few studies have examined differences in clinical profiles between actual and protein-predicted BMI. Hypothesis: Plasma protein-based BMI classification will better capture cardiometabolic risk compared to actual BMI classification. Methods: Data on cardiometabolic phenotypes and plasma proteins (4979 proteins via SomaScan) were available in 645 adults (56% Female, 35% Black, 17-65 yrs) from the HERITAGE Family Study. LASSO regression models with 10-fold-cross-validation were used to create a BMI proteomic signature. Protein-predicted BMI was classified into weight classes and compared to actual BMI classification to create 7 groups (underpredicted, matched, or overpredicted) ( Fig 1A ). General linear models adjusted for age, sex, race, and measured BMI were used to examine differences in cardiometabolic traits across groups. Results: The LASSO model (R 2 =0.82, RMSE=2.2) included 208 proteins. Protein-predicted BMI correlated with actual BMI at r=0.95 (p<0.0001), with a 16% misclassification rate ( Fig 1A ). Participants whose proteins underpredicted BMI class generally had more favorable cardiometabolic profiles than matched groups of the same class, while overpredicted BMI class groups showed worse cardiometabolic profiles than matched groups of the same class ( Fig 1B ). Conclusions: We identified individuals matched for BMI but with opposing proteomic signatures that differed in cardiometabolic risk profiles. Proteomic profiling may identify clinically meaningful heterogeneity in cardiometabolic health not fully captured by BMI that could potentially be used as biomarkers and/or targets of therapeutic responsiveness.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Broad Institute (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.