Abstract P1148: Coping with stressors: Does it predict health behaviors over more than a decade?

Objective: Emerging research suggests the use of certain strategies to cope with stressors relate to disease and mortality risk, and lifestyle habits may be underlying mechanisms. Studies show psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety) and states (e.g., happiness) predict the likelihood of adopting an integrated lifestyle that encompasses key health-related behaviors, like smoking. Yet, whether psychological processes , including stress-related coping, influence the adoption of a healthy lifestyle is unknown. We investigated whether coping strategies typically deemed adaptive (e.g., seeking emotional support) and maladaptive (e.g., denial) relate to sustaining a healthy lifestyle over a 16-year follow-up. We also explored whether variability in use of these strategies, reflecting attempts to find the best strategy for a given stressor, subsequently relates to lifestyle. Methods: Women (N=46,067) from the Nurses’ Health Study II reported their use of eight coping strategies in 2001, from which we also derived coping variability levels (lower, moderate, greater). Health behaviors (e.g., physical activity, smoking, sleep) self-reported every four years from baseline until 2017, were combined into a lifestyle score. Generalized estimating equations, controlling for baseline demographics and health status, were performed. Results: Most adaptive strategies and greater variability levels were associated with higher likelihood of sustaining a healthy lifestyle (e.g., Active Coping, Relative Risk [RR]=1.09, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.08-1.10), with the reverse evident with maladaptive strategies (e.g., Behavioral Disengagement, RR=0.93, CI=0.92-0.94), but some unexpected results also emerged. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of going beyond the usual (mal)adaptive categorization of coping strategies when investigating their predictive value with behavioral outcomes.