Abstract P2161: Validation Of a Novel Method to Evaluate Local-scale Community-based Interventions That Improve Access to Fruits and Vegetables

Background: Adequate intake of fruits and vegetables (FV) is important for cardiovascular health. Evaluating community-based dietary programs in under-resourced areas is challenging, necessitating innovative data collection methods. These methods must adapt to community contexts, enhancing the accessibility of impact evaluation for programs operating in neighborhood settings, including community centers, schools, and farmers’ markets. Aims: This study aimed to develop and pilot a survey instrument designed to overcome barriers in data collection within community-based programs, focusing on measuring changes in health behaviors. The tool aims to validate a concise set of process and outcome measures, addressing the evaluation challenges of small, local initiatives. Methods: The survey development was a theory-driven, participatory process with stakeholders to ensure the tool was culturally sensitive and capable of capturing data relevant to health outcomes. The survey was pilot tested in four Social Impact Fund programs in California, Florida, and Georgia. One program provided free meals, two provided discounted produce, and one was a traditional farmers’ market stand. The bilingual survey (English and Spanish) covered demographics, program participation, frequency of FV intake, and barriers to healthy eating. It was delivered via in-person interviews, tablets, and personal smartphones. Results: The pilot achieved high feasibility, with a 98.2% completion rate from 111 participants for the 20-item survey, taking an average of eight minutes. Overall, 62.5% (95% CI 49.7, 75.3) of participants said that their FV intake increased due to the programs, with the top reasons being affordability and quality. Participants also reported barriers to increasing FV intake, Figure 1, with 50% (95% CI 39.9, 60.1) saying cost, followed by time constraints and accessibility. Conclusion: The pilot results affirm the feasibility of evaluating programs aiming to improve diet in high-disparity neighborhoods. The results indicate a strong community desire for such programs and underscore a pivotal finding: when fruits and vegetables are affordable and accessible and meals are readily available at a low cost, community members are more likely to adopt healthier diets. This participatory approach proves that a well-validated, concise survey tool can efficiently collect health data in unconventional settings, promoting health equity by adapting to specific needs of communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p2161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P2161: Validation Of a Novel Method to Evaluate Local-scale Community-based Interventions That Improve Access to Fruits and Vegetables

Sally Honeycutt, Gregory A. Roth, Emmanuela Gakidou, Kate LeGrand et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Abstract P2161: Validation Of a Novel Method to Evaluate Local-scale Community-based Interventions That Improve Access to Fruits and Vegetables

Sally Honeycutt, Gregory A. Roth, Emmanuela Gakidou, Kate LeGrand, Jennifer L. Hall, Ali H. Mokdad, Louisa Ewald, Claire Ugo-Ike
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Adequate intake of fruits and vegetables (FV) is important for cardiovascular health. Evaluating community-based dietary programs in under-resourced areas is challenging, necessitating innovative data collection methods. These methods must adapt to community contexts, enhancing the accessibility of impact evaluation for programs operating in neighborhood settings, including community centers, schools, and farmers’ markets. Aims: This study aimed to develop and pilot a survey instrument designed to overcome barriers in data collection within community-based programs, focusing on measuring changes in health behaviors. The tool aims to validate a concise set of process and outcome measures, addressing the evaluation challenges of small, local initiatives. Methods: The survey development was a theory-driven, participatory process with stakeholders to ensure the tool was culturally sensitive and capable of capturing data relevant to health outcomes. The survey was pilot tested in four Social Impact Fund programs in California, Florida, and Georgia. One program provided free meals, two provided discounted produce, and one was a traditional farmers’ market stand. The bilingual survey (English and Spanish) covered demographics, program participation, frequency of FV intake, and barriers to healthy eating. It was delivered via in-person interviews, tablets, and personal smartphones. Results: The pilot achieved high feasibility, with a 98.2% completion rate from 111 participants for the 20-item survey, taking an average of eight minutes. Overall, 62.5% (95% CI 49.7, 75.3) of participants said that their FV intake increased due to the programs, with the top reasons being affordability and quality. Participants also reported barriers to increasing FV intake, Figure 1, with 50% (95% CI 39.9, 60.1) saying cost, followed by time constraints and accessibility. Conclusion: The pilot results affirm the feasibility of evaluating programs aiming to improve diet in high-disparity neighborhoods. The results indicate a strong community desire for such programs and underscore a pivotal finding: when fruits and vegetables are affordable and accessible and meals are readily available at a low cost, community members are more likely to adopt healthier diets. This participatory approach proves that a well-validated, concise survey tool can efficiently collect health data in unconventional settings, promoting health equity by adapting to specific needs of communities.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
American Heart Association (US), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.