Abstract MP07: Derivations of Supine and Standing Blood Pressure and Their Associations with Adverse Cardiovascular and Hypotension-Related Events

Background: Postural drops in systolic blood pressure (SBP) are associated with cardiovascular and hypotension-related adverse events (falls, syncope). These associations are traditionally thought to be secondary to low standing blood pressure; however, the role of both high and low SBP in supine and standing positions has not been thoroughly characterized. Objectives: To compare traditional and alternative derivations of supine and standing SBP with adverse cardiovascular and hypotension-related outcomes. Methods: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study measured supine and standing SBP in adult participants aged 45-64 between 1987–1989 and followed them for over 30 years. We examined low and high values (see Table) of supine SBP, standing SBP, absolute and relative differences in SBP after standing, and mean SBP between both positions in relation to adjudicated coronary heart disease (CHD) or all-cause mortality events as well as medical claims-based falls and syncope. We used Cox regression with adjustment for CVD risk factors. Cutpoints were chosen to match a population percentile approximating a 20 mm Hg difference between supine and standing SBP (the traditional definition for orthostatic hypotension). Results: Among 11,399 participants (mean age 54 yr [SD, 5.7]; 56% female; 25% Black adults), relative or absolute drops in SBP were associated with CHD and mortality. Higher mean supine and standing BP was also associated with CHD (HR 1.72; 1.41, 2.09) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.74; 1.54, 1.96). An absolute decrease (HR 1.24; 1.02, 1.50) or increase (HR 1.27; 1.01, 1.60) in SBP was associated with falls. An absolute or relative decrease (both HRs 1.48) and higher supine SBP (HR 1.30; 1.07, 1.58) were associated with syncope. Lower supine SBP was inversely associated with CHD (HR 0.62) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.82). Lower standing SBP was also inversely associated with CHD (HR 0.78; 0.64, 0.94) but not with falls or syncope. Conclusion: While both cardiovascular and hypotension-related outcomes were associated with postural drops in SBP, these outcomes were not consistently associated with low standing SBP. Rather, high supine SBP was associated with a greater risk of CHD, syncope, and death. Moreover, a rise in SBP with standing was associated with falls. These findings call attention to high SBP as a risk factor for both cardiovascular and hypotension-related outcomes and may have implications for treatment strategies if replicated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.mp07
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract MP07: Derivations of Supine and Standing Blood Pressure and Their Associations with Adverse Cardiovascular and Hypotension-Related Events

Ruth‐Alma Turkson‐Ocran, F. Larbi, B Gwen Windham, Stephen Paul Juraschek et al.
Circulation
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Abstract MP07: Derivations of Supine and Standing Blood Pressure and Their Associations with Adverse Cardiovascular and Hypotension-Related Events

Ruth‐Alma Turkson‐Ocran, F. Larbi, B Gwen Windham, Stephen Paul Juraschek, Md Marufuzzaman Khan, Pamela L. Lutsey, Michael Mate-Kole, Lynne E. Wagenknecht, Hannah Col, Long Ngo, Elizabeth Selvin
article en

Abstract

Background: Postural drops in systolic blood pressure (SBP) are associated with cardiovascular and hypotension-related adverse events (falls, syncope). These associations are traditionally thought to be secondary to low standing blood pressure; however, the role of both high and low SBP in supine and standing positions has not been thoroughly characterized. Objectives: To compare traditional and alternative derivations of supine and standing SBP with adverse cardiovascular and hypotension-related outcomes. Methods: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study measured supine and standing SBP in adult participants aged 45-64 between 1987–1989 and followed them for over 30 years. We examined low and high values (see Table) of supine SBP, standing SBP, absolute and relative differences in SBP after standing, and mean SBP between both positions in relation to adjudicated coronary heart disease (CHD) or all-cause mortality events as well as medical claims-based falls and syncope. We used Cox regression with adjustment for CVD risk factors. Cutpoints were chosen to match a population percentile approximating a 20 mm Hg difference between supine and standing SBP (the traditional definition for orthostatic hypotension). Results: Among 11,399 participants (mean age 54 yr [SD, 5.7]; 56% female; 25% Black adults), relative or absolute drops in SBP were associated with CHD and mortality. Higher mean supine and standing BP was also associated with CHD (HR 1.72; 1.41, 2.09) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.74; 1.54, 1.96). An absolute decrease (HR 1.24; 1.02, 1.50) or increase (HR 1.27; 1.01, 1.60) in SBP was associated with falls. An absolute or relative decrease (both HRs 1.48) and higher supine SBP (HR 1.30; 1.07, 1.58) were associated with syncope. Lower supine SBP was inversely associated with CHD (HR 0.62) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.82). Lower standing SBP was also inversely associated with CHD (HR 0.78; 0.64, 0.94) but not with falls or syncope. Conclusion: While both cardiovascular and hypotension-related outcomes were associated with postural drops in SBP, these outcomes were not consistently associated with low standing SBP. Rather, high supine SBP was associated with a greater risk of CHD, syncope, and death. Moreover, a rise in SBP with standing was associated with falls. These findings call attention to high SBP as a risk factor for both cardiovascular and hypotension-related outcomes and may have implications for treatment strategies if replicated.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.