Abstract P3077: Pro-Enkephalin A and Risk of Incident Hypertension: The REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Introduction: Hypertension, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, poses a significant burden in the U.S, especially among Black U.S. adults. Higher pro-enkephalin A (PENK-A), a byproduct of endogenous opioid peptide processing and a novel marker for estimation of glomerular filtration rate, is associated with antihypertensive use and greater risk of stroke, heart failure, and renal dysfunction. Whether low PENK-A is a risk factor for incident hypertension is unknown. Hypotheses: We hypothesized that lower PENK-A will be associated with greater risk of incident hypertension. Methods: REGARDS cohort study enrolled 30,239 Black and White U.S adults aged ≥45 years, with an initial visit between 2003-2007 and a follow-up visit in 2013-2016. A race-sex stratified sample of 4,400 participants were randomly selected. Hypertension was defined with a blood pressure (BP) threshold of 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medications. We excluded those with prevalent hypertension, missing model covariates, or missing PENK-A, resulting in an analytical population of 1,859 participants. Proportion of incident hypertension events were calculated by tertile of PENK-A. Modified Poisson regression estimated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RR) of incident hypertension per 1-SD higher of log-transformed PENK-A. Results: Among 1,859 participants (mean [SD] age 62 [8] years, 51% female, and 36% Black race), median (IQR) follow up was 9.5 (8.7 to 10.0) years. Median (IQR) PENK-A was 59.7 (49.6-72.4) pmol/L. Hypertension developed in 35.4% of participants overall, (37.7% of tertile 1, 34.9% of tertile 2, and 33.7% of tertile 3 of PENK-A). However, there was no difference in RR of incident hypertension per 1-SD higher of log PENK-A in unadjusted (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.02) or fully-adjusted models (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08). Restricted cubic splines depict no difference in RR of incident hypertension across the means of PENK-A levels relative to the median value ( Figure ). Conclusions: PENK-A was not associated with greater risk of incident hypertension in a contemporary cohort study. PENK-A does not appear to influence risk for stroke and heart failure through hypertension, but whether PENK-A modifies cardiovascular disease risk among persons with hypertension is unclear given its bidirectional role in the cardiorenal pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p3077
Primary Topic
Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P3077: Pro-Enkephalin A and Risk of Incident Hypertension: The REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Timothy B. Plante, Samuel Short, Janin Schulte, D. Leann Long et al.
Circulation
Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
article

Abstract P3077: Pro-Enkephalin A and Risk of Incident Hypertension: The REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Timothy B. Plante, Samuel Short, Janin Schulte, D. Leann Long, Virginia J. Howard, George Howard, Suzanne Judd, Rhea Puthumana
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, poses a significant burden in the U.S, especially among Black U.S. adults. Higher pro-enkephalin A (PENK-A), a byproduct of endogenous opioid peptide processing and a novel marker for estimation of glomerular filtration rate, is associated with antihypertensive use and greater risk of stroke, heart failure, and renal dysfunction. Whether low PENK-A is a risk factor for incident hypertension is unknown. Hypotheses: We hypothesized that lower PENK-A will be associated with greater risk of incident hypertension. Methods: REGARDS cohort study enrolled 30,239 Black and White U.S adults aged ≥45 years, with an initial visit between 2003-2007 and a follow-up visit in 2013-2016. A race-sex stratified sample of 4,400 participants were randomly selected. Hypertension was defined with a blood pressure (BP) threshold of 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medications. We excluded those with prevalent hypertension, missing model covariates, or missing PENK-A, resulting in an analytical population of 1,859 participants. Proportion of incident hypertension events were calculated by tertile of PENK-A. Modified Poisson regression estimated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RR) of incident hypertension per 1-SD higher of log-transformed PENK-A. Results: Among 1,859 participants (mean [SD] age 62 [8] years, 51% female, and 36% Black race), median (IQR) follow up was 9.5 (8.7 to 10.0) years. Median (IQR) PENK-A was 59.7 (49.6-72.4) pmol/L. Hypertension developed in 35.4% of participants overall, (37.7% of tertile 1, 34.9% of tertile 2, and 33.7% of tertile 3 of PENK-A). However, there was no difference in RR of incident hypertension per 1-SD higher of log PENK-A in unadjusted (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.02) or fully-adjusted models (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08). Restricted cubic splines depict no difference in RR of incident hypertension across the means of PENK-A levels relative to the median value ( Figure ). Conclusions: PENK-A was not associated with greater risk of incident hypertension in a contemporary cohort study. PENK-A does not appear to influence risk for stroke and heart failure through hypertension, but whether PENK-A modifies cardiovascular disease risk among persons with hypertension is unclear given its bidirectional role in the cardiorenal pathway.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
University of Vermont (US), Alabama Department of Public Health (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.