Abstract P3110: Objective overeating by chronic stress level among men and women in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Background: Dysfunctional eating behaviors, including overeating, may serve as coping strategies against chronic stress (CS). US-residing Latinos face disproportionate exposure to CS, but overeating remains understudied in this population. Furthermore, overeating is usually measured using subjective scales, with little data on objective measures of overall excessive intake. This study estimated the distribution of objective overeating (OO) among US Latino men and women by CS. Methods: Data from adult participants of the Sociocultural Ancillary Study of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (n=4,940; mean ± SD age 42.2 ± 0.37; 55.3% female) were used. CS was measured using a scale that assessed stressors across eight life domains, present for at least six months, and rated as moderately/very stressful, and was categorized into 0, 1, 2, or 3+ stressors. Dietary intake was assessed using two 24-hour recalls. Usual dietary intake was estimated accounting for within- to between-person variance, demographic, and clinical covariates using the National Cancer Institute method and bootstrap weights for variance estimation. Objective overeating was quantified with the following equation: Total energy intake > Basal Metabolic Rate x Physical activity factor + 500 due to the hypothesis that consuming 500 calories over the daily caloric needs every day for one week can lead to an increase of one pound. The physical activity factor was assessed with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. All analyses used appropriate sample weight and complex survey procedures. Results: The survey-weighted prevalence of 0, 1, 2, and 3+ CS, was 44.7%, 22.0%, 14.9% and 18.4%, respectively. The overall prevalence of OO was 21.7% (SE 2.7). Sex was significantly associated with OO (B = 1.05, p = 0.002), indicating the distribution of OO is significantly different among men and women. Among men, estimated OO prevalence by CS were as follows: 28.3% (SE 6.62) for 0 CS, 28.0% (SE 12.5) for 1 CS, 26.3% (SE 8.7) for 2 CS, and 33.6% (SE 9.9) for 3+ CS. Among women results were: 16.9% (SE 3.7) for 0 CS, 13.9% (SE 4.5) for 1 CS, 18.2% (SE 4.8) for 2 CS, and 17.0% (SE 6.9) for 3+ CS. Conclusion: Among US-residing Latinos, there are patterns of elevated overeating, measured objectively, across higher CS categories, as well as sex-based differences. Men had higher OO at higher categories of stress compared to women. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p3110
Primary Topic
Health and Lifestyle Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P3110: Objective overeating by chronic stress level among men and women in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Krista M. Perreira, Aditya Mehta, Carmen R. Isasi, Charis Wiltshire et al.
Circulation
Health and Lifestyle Studies
article

Abstract P3110: Objective overeating by chronic stress level among men and women in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Krista M. Perreira, Aditya Mehta, Carmen R. Isasi, Charis Wiltshire, Andrea Lopez, Josiemer Mattei, Daniela Sotres‐Alvarez, Shakira F. Suglia, Linda Van Horn, Hanqi Luo, Cynthia M. Pérez, Linda C. Gallo, Martha Taméz, Martha L. Daviglus, Salma Parra Pulgarin
article en

Abstract

Background: Dysfunctional eating behaviors, including overeating, may serve as coping strategies against chronic stress (CS). US-residing Latinos face disproportionate exposure to CS, but overeating remains understudied in this population. Furthermore, overeating is usually measured using subjective scales, with little data on objective measures of overall excessive intake. This study estimated the distribution of objective overeating (OO) among US Latino men and women by CS. Methods: Data from adult participants of the Sociocultural Ancillary Study of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (n=4,940; mean ± SD age 42.2 ± 0.37; 55.3% female) were used. CS was measured using a scale that assessed stressors across eight life domains, present for at least six months, and rated as moderately/very stressful, and was categorized into 0, 1, 2, or 3+ stressors. Dietary intake was assessed using two 24-hour recalls. Usual dietary intake was estimated accounting for within- to between-person variance, demographic, and clinical covariates using the National Cancer Institute method and bootstrap weights for variance estimation. Objective overeating was quantified with the following equation: Total energy intake > Basal Metabolic Rate x Physical activity factor + 500 due to the hypothesis that consuming 500 calories over the daily caloric needs every day for one week can lead to an increase of one pound. The physical activity factor was assessed with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. All analyses used appropriate sample weight and complex survey procedures. Results: The survey-weighted prevalence of 0, 1, 2, and 3+ CS, was 44.7%, 22.0%, 14.9% and 18.4%, respectively. The overall prevalence of OO was 21.7% (SE 2.7). Sex was significantly associated with OO (B = 1.05, p = 0.002), indicating the distribution of OO is significantly different among men and women. Among men, estimated OO prevalence by CS were as follows: 28.3% (SE 6.62) for 0 CS, 28.0% (SE 12.5) for 1 CS, 26.3% (SE 8.7) for 2 CS, and 33.6% (SE 9.9) for 3+ CS. Among women results were: 16.9% (SE 3.7) for 0 CS, 13.9% (SE 4.5) for 1 CS, 18.2% (SE 4.8) for 2 CS, and 17.0% (SE 6.9) for 3+ CS. Conclusion: Among US-residing Latinos, there are patterns of elevated overeating, measured objectively, across higher CS categories, as well as sex-based differences. Men had higher OO at higher categories of stress compared to women. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Northwestern University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US), Harvard University (US), Emory University (US), University of Puerto Rico System (PR), San Diego State University (US), Rollins College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Health and Lifestyle Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.