Comparative study of the characteristics of the energy flow and food web structure in the Laizhou Bay ecosystem based on the Ecopath and LIM-MCMC models

This study compared the characteristics of energy flow and food web structure in the Laizhou Bay ecosystem using the Ecopath model and linear inverse models enhanced by Monte Carlo methods coupled with a Markov Chain (LIM-MCMC), respectively, based on survey data collected in May, August, and November 2022. The ecosystem was divided into 22 functional groups with trophic levels ranging from 1.00 to 3.48 and a large proportion of predator groups. The Ecopath model estimated an overall energy transfer efficiency of 5.34%, with the detrital food chain exhibiting significantly higher energy transfer efficiency (6.73%) than the grazing food chain (5.31%). Energy flow paths in the LIM-MCMC model were classified into four primary routes, predominantly driven by respiration and the inflow of detritus at lower trophic levels, which accounted for 79.9% of the total energy flow in group a. The Ecopath model provided a connectance index of 0.30, a system omnivory index of 0.33, Finn’s mean path length of 2.46, and Finn’s cycle index of 8.18%, whereas the LIM-MCMC model produced an average path length of 2.78. Both models indicated a shorter food chain and low complexity of the food web. Total system throughput (TST) was estimated at 10,086.1 (Ecopath) and 10,968.0 t·km -2 a -1 (LIM-MCMC), with total respiration and total flows into detritus accounting for 41.2% and 51.1% of TST, respectively. The total primary production to total respiration ratios were 1.40 (Ecopath) and 0.86 (LIM-MCMC). Despite consistent ecosystem parameters across both models—total consumption (4,407.7 t·km -2 a -1 ), total primary production (3,606.4 t·km -2 a -1 ), and total biomas (151.0 t·km -2 a -1 )—the Ecopath model suggested a relatively mature ecosystem, whereas the LIM-MCMC model indicated that this ecosystem was in an unstable developmental stage with low energy utilisation efficiency of primary productivity

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1572355
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of the characteristics of the energy flow and food web structure in the Laizhou Bay ecosystem based on the Ecopath and LIM-MCMC models

Ren Zhonghua, Xu Bingqing, Fan Li, Jisong Yang et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Marine Science
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
5.15
article

Comparative study of the characteristics of the energy flow and food web structure in the Laizhou Bay ecosystem based on the Ecopath and LIM-MCMC models

Ren Zhonghua, Xu Bingqing, Fan Li, Jisong Yang, Min Li, Lv Zhenbo, Cui Wenhui, Dong Xiuqiang, Zhang Depu, Li Shengfu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study compared the characteristics of energy flow and food web structure in the Laizhou Bay ecosystem using the Ecopath model and linear inverse models enhanced by Monte Carlo methods coupled with a Markov Chain (LIM-MCMC), respectively, based on survey data collected in May, August, and November 2022. The ecosystem was divided into 22 functional groups with trophic levels ranging from 1.00 to 3.48 and a large proportion of predator groups. The Ecopath model estimated an overall energy transfer efficiency of 5.34%, with the detrital food chain exhibiting significantly higher energy transfer efficiency (6.73%) than the grazing food chain (5.31%). Energy flow paths in the LIM-MCMC model were classified into four primary routes, predominantly driven by respiration and the inflow of detritus at lower trophic levels, which accounted for 79.9% of the total energy flow in group a. The Ecopath model provided a connectance index of 0.30, a system omnivory index of 0.33, Finn’s mean path length of 2.46, and Finn’s cycle index of 8.18%, whereas the LIM-MCMC model produced an average path length of 2.78. Both models indicated a shorter food chain and low complexity of the food web. Total system throughput (TST) was estimated at 10,086.1 (Ecopath) and 10,968.0 t·km -2 a -1 (LIM-MCMC), with total respiration and total flows into detritus accounting for 41.2% and 51.1% of TST, respectively. The total primary production to total respiration ratios were 1.40 (Ecopath) and 0.86 (LIM-MCMC). Despite consistent ecosystem parameters across both models—total consumption (4,407.7 t·km -2 a -1 ), total primary production (3,606.4 t·km -2 a -1 ), and total biomas (151.0 t·km -2 a -1 )—the Ecopath model suggested a relatively mature ecosystem, whereas the LIM-MCMC model indicated that this ecosystem was in an unstable developmental stage with low energy utilisation efficiency of primary productivity

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
Ludong University (CN), Agriculture Fisheries and Conservation Department (CN), Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute (CN), Liaoning Ocean and Fisheries Research Institute (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.