Abstract P1007: Detecting Physical Frailty Phenotype Using Wearable Device

Introduction: Identifying and monitoring frailty can inform optimal care for older adults. This study aimed to detect frailty using wearable device-measured movement behaviors (MBs). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that random forest models were able to detect frailty using MBs. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 44 older adults living in the community (79.6±9.3 years old; 84% females). The Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) was defined as having 3 or more of unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness, and weakness. Participants wore a thigh-worn ActivPAL for 10 consecutive days. MBs were quantified as: 1) overall activity (activity score, daily steps and number of sit-to-stand), 2) time in postures (standing, stepping, sitting and lying), 3) time in bed, 4) time in sitting bouts over 30 min and 60 min, 5) stepping counts and time in <1, 1-5, 5-10 and 10-20 min bouts, 6) stepping counts and time in cadences >75 and >100, and 7) peak stepping counts in 10 seconds, 2, 6, and 10 min. Random forest models were developed to classify FFP and its 5 individual components, with age, sex, BMI, and MBs as predictor variables. Results: Eleven (25%) participants were frail. The average ActivPAL wear time was 9.14±1.49 days. The model achieved an AUC [95% CI] of 0.85 [0.71-0.99] for FFP. The 5 most important predictors were time in standing, stepping time in < 1 min bouts, time in stepping, stepping counts in 10-20 min bouts, and stepping counts in 1-5 min bouts (Table). The models for individual FFP components also achieved AUC [95% CI] of 0.90 [0.77-1.00] for unintentional weight loss, 0.89 [0.78-1.00] for exhaustion, 0.88 [0.76-0.99] for slowness, 0.81 [0.63-0.99] for low physical activity, and 0.94 [0.87-1.00] for weakness (Table). Conclusions: A thigh-worn wearable device can detect FPP with high accuracy. Once validated in an independent sample, our algorithm can be useful for frailty assessment and monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p1007
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P1007: Detecting Physical Frailty Phenotype Using Wearable Device

Amanda E. Paluch, Dae Hyun Kim, Lingsong Kong, Yuchen Liu et al.
Circulation
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Abstract P1007: Detecting Physical Frailty Phenotype Using Wearable Device

Amanda E. Paluch, Dae Hyun Kim, Lingsong Kong, Yuchen Liu, Kuan-Yuan Wang, Kailin Xu, Joel Miscione, Jillian Qua, Eric Regina
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying and monitoring frailty can inform optimal care for older adults. This study aimed to detect frailty using wearable device-measured movement behaviors (MBs). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that random forest models were able to detect frailty using MBs. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 44 older adults living in the community (79.6±9.3 years old; 84% females). The Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) was defined as having 3 or more of unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness, and weakness. Participants wore a thigh-worn ActivPAL for 10 consecutive days. MBs were quantified as: 1) overall activity (activity score, daily steps and number of sit-to-stand), 2) time in postures (standing, stepping, sitting and lying), 3) time in bed, 4) time in sitting bouts over 30 min and 60 min, 5) stepping counts and time in <1, 1-5, 5-10 and 10-20 min bouts, 6) stepping counts and time in cadences >75 and >100, and 7) peak stepping counts in 10 seconds, 2, 6, and 10 min. Random forest models were developed to classify FFP and its 5 individual components, with age, sex, BMI, and MBs as predictor variables. Results: Eleven (25%) participants were frail. The average ActivPAL wear time was 9.14±1.49 days. The model achieved an AUC [95% CI] of 0.85 [0.71-0.99] for FFP. The 5 most important predictors were time in standing, stepping time in < 1 min bouts, time in stepping, stepping counts in 10-20 min bouts, and stepping counts in 1-5 min bouts (Table). The models for individual FFP components also achieved AUC [95% CI] of 0.90 [0.77-1.00] for unintentional weight loss, 0.89 [0.78-1.00] for exhaustion, 0.88 [0.76-0.99] for slowness, 0.81 [0.63-0.99] for low physical activity, and 0.94 [0.87-1.00] for weakness (Table). Conclusions: A thigh-worn wearable device can detect FPP with high accuracy. Once validated in an independent sample, our algorithm can be useful for frailty assessment and monitoring.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Harvard University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.